Recently someone told me that she liked the bumper sticker on my car, but as she stated her reasons for appreciating it, I realized she had misread it. It was an understandable error. I don't recall exactly when I placed it on the bumper, but it was probably ten or more years ago. As the years have taken their toll on both the bumper sticker and the vehicle it's attached to, the sticker has begun to curl at the edges, partially obscuring the message. The person who liked it had seen only, "God is NOT a Republican." She'd not noticed the "Or a Democrat."
I should add that this admirer of my bumper sticker saw it in a church setting. Unfortunately I didn't have a chance to follow up with her and see if she liked because she thought it a nice counter-balance to the way some conservative Christians have intertwined faith and the Republican party. Or perhaps she liked it because she thinks God is more of a Democrat. But when the bumper sticker spoke its entire message, it proclaims a God belonging to no political party. God is non-partisan, but that does not mean God is not political. In fact, God is very political.
The laws that God gives in the Old Testament require a certain sort of community, one that cares for the poor, where landowners must leave part of their crop behind for the needy, and where land that the rich have acquired must be returned to the original owners every 50 years. All debts were to be canceled at the same time. Implementing such requirements was a political undertaking, and there is not a lot of evidence that Israel ever abided by all these rules. No doubt the rich and powerful objected.
When Jesus came, he stood firmly in the politics of God and the Old Testament prophets. He said he came to bring "good news to the poor... release to the captive... to proclaim the year of the Lord's favor." The year of the Lord's favor is the year when property goes back to original owners and all debts are called off. No wonder Jesus scared the powers-that-be.
A lot of people wish "the church would stay out of politics," but doing so requires ignoring an awful lot that God/Jesus said. Relegating Jesus to a personal Savior concerned only with getting you to heaven requires ignoring huge portions of Jesus' teachings.
Jesus was political. Jesus did not get executed by Rome because he was meek and nice. He got executed because he was perceived as a threat. He proclaimed a Kingdom of God that put the poor and outcast first and the rich and powerful last. "Blessed are you who are poor for yours is the Kingdom of God... But woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation." (Luke 6:20, 24)
The people who ran the current kingdom, the one headed by the Roman emperor, didn't like such talk. Neither did the wealthy leaders of Temple Judaism who had a good thing going with the Romans. But the poor, the regular folks who paid the exorbitant taxes, loved it. That scared Rome and the Jewish powers-that-be even more.
But while Jesus is political in the extreme, his methods did not look at all like others who wanted to shake up the system. No violent overthrow. No weapons. Instead he called his followers to operate out of an ethic of love. Jesus called out injustice. He condemned those who exploited the poor and weak and marginalized, but his political vision was to be enacted in strange ways, ways that loved and prayed for enemies. (Although Jesus did once get so upset by Temple vendors who were ripping off pilgrims that he ran them out of the place.)
Perhaps no one in recent US history has embodied Jesus' way of being political better than Martin Luther King, Jr. He pulled no punches in condemning the politics of segregation that dehumanized African Americans while reserving the riches and benefits of America for whites. MLK terrified the powerful in much of America, but not because of weapons or violence.
I wonder if American Christianity can ever recover a faith that is political in the manner of Jesus or MLK. I think Jesus and MLK could act as they did, being very political but not engaging in hatred or violence, because they trusted that God was part of their cause. The assurance that God was engaged in the struggle meant that outcomes were not entirely up to them. They could struggle and suffer because they knew, as Dr. King said, that "the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice." It so bends because God is a God of justice, and justice always involves politics.
As someone who sees much happening in our country right now that goes against God's care for the poor, the vulnerable, the immigrant, it is easy to despair. Such despair often turns to frustration and anger, and I rarely act in ways that are helpful when my anger burns hot.
But if God is indeed a God of politics, a God who will not long remain on the sidelines as the poor and vulnerable cry out, then my despair and anger can be tempered by hope. I can argue and agitate for the politics of God with resorting to self-destructive behaviors driven by anger and despair. But oh do I wish that the arc would bend a little more speedily. Come quickly, Lord Jesus.
Sermons and thoughts on faith on Scripture from my time at Old Presbyterian Meeting House and Falls Church Presbyterian Church, plus sermons and postings from "Pastor James," my blog while pastor at Boulevard Presbyterian in Columbus, OH.
Thursday, June 28, 2018
Sunday, June 24, 2018
Sermon: Faith and Daring Speech
Mark 4:35-41
Faith and Daring Speech
James Sledge June
24, 2008
I
imagine that many of you have heard some version of this story before. Matthew,
Mark, and Luke all tell of Jesus stilling the storm. I’m partial to Mark’s
version. Somewhat atypically for the shortest gospel, Mark has the longest and
fullest depiction.
Jesus
directs the disciples to cross the Sea of Galilee at night, not necessarily a
great idea. But the disciples do as Jesus says, apparently without question or
objection. But out on the water, in the dark, a terrific storm arises. It whips
up waves that begin to break over the sides of the boat. The disciples are no
doubt bailing water out as fast as they can, but it is a losing battle. The
boat is being swamped.
Meanwhile,
Jesus is asleep. He has been teaching and healing at a breakneck pace, and the
crowds won’t leave him alone. Perhaps he is so exhausted that he could sleep
through anything. But as the situation grows more and more dire, the disciples
wake him up.
I
don’t know if they expect Jesus to do anything or not. Maybe they just feel
like he should be worried and frightened, too. They are all about to drown,
after all. But Jesus rebukes the wind and tells the sea to quiet down, and all
is calm.
Then they cried to the Lord in their trouble, and he brought
them out from their distress; he made the storm be still, and the waves of the
sea were hushed. That’s
from Psalm 107, and it’s speaking about God.
“Who then is this, that even the wind
and the sea obey him?” the disciples ask, as they quake in awe and fear.
______________________________________________________________________________
The
story of Jesus stilling the storm shows up every three years in the lectionary,
paired with the story of David and Goliath. Typically I’ve seen it focusing on
two things. One is Jesus’ identity, and the other is faith. Here faith is about
more than believing in God or Jesus. It is about trusting in the power of God
to save, the sort of trust that allows the boy David to face the mighty warrior
Goliath with only his sling.
But
for some reason that didn’t quite work for me this time, at least not the faith
part. Jesus accuses the disciples of having no faith. But they have turned to
Jesus in their distress. They cried out to the Lord in their trouble, and he brought
them out…” to quote the psalm. Does being afraid mean having no faith?
That’s troubling. I’ve got fears a plenty.
If the disciples had come to Jesus cool as cucumbers and said, “Hey Jesus, would you mind fixing this?” would
Jesus had done the same miracle but not chastised them about their faith? Or is
the faith problem about something else.
______________________________________________________________________________
Tuesday, June 19, 2018
Statement from the Session of Falls Church Presbyterian
In light of US immigration officials separating children from
parents, and the US Attorney General's appeal to Scripture to support
this, this congregation's Session (discernment/governing council)
publicly declares the following:
The Falls Church Presbyterian Church (FCPC) rejects the claim that the Christian faith or the Bible excuses or condones government policies that forcibly separate children and their parents, or otherwise dehumanize refugees and immigrants. We reject any practice, policy, or law that denies God's beloved children their dignity. We oppose all attempts by the powerful to justify oppression or mistreatment of the powerless. We follow Jesus, who teaches that faithfulness is better measured by the loving care we provide to strangers, foreigners, and prisoners than by public proclamations of piety--and so we at FCPC rededicate ourselves to ways we can provide direct support and care to those in need.
The Falls Church Presbyterian Church (FCPC) rejects the claim that the Christian faith or the Bible excuses or condones government policies that forcibly separate children and their parents, or otherwise dehumanize refugees and immigrants. We reject any practice, policy, or law that denies God's beloved children their dignity. We oppose all attempts by the powerful to justify oppression or mistreatment of the powerless. We follow Jesus, who teaches that faithfulness is better measured by the loving care we provide to strangers, foreigners, and prisoners than by public proclamations of piety--and so we at FCPC rededicate ourselves to ways we can provide direct support and care to those in need.
Monday, June 11, 2018
Sunday, June 10, 2018
Sermon: Crazy Like Jesus
Mark 3:19b-35
Crazy Like Jesus
James Sledge June
10, 2018
I’m
going to go out on a limb here and say that most of you don’t spend a lot of
time worrying about Satan or the power of demons. In fact, many progressive
Christians, including pastors such as myself, are a little unnerved, even
embarrassed, by biblical talk of Satan and demonic possession. Clearly this comes
from ancient peoples who weren’t sophisticated enough to understand things like
mental illness or epilepsy.
But
sometimes I wonder if our “sophistication” isn’t actually an arrogance that
does not serve us well. We sometimes imagine that there’s no evil, only
problems to be solved. At some point progress and advancement will inexorably
lead to a better and better world.
At
the dawn of the 20th century, many believed progress would soon do
away with war in a unified Christian earth, only to witness one world war
followed shortly by another. Imagine the despair of those who thought humanity
was about to achieve world peace but instead saw millions and millions slaughtered
in battle, killed by bombs raining down on civilian populations, and exterminated
in the Holocaust.
Mainline
and progressive Christians often fall captive to despair these days. I know I
do. Granted we do not face world war or Holocaust, but things we hoped for and
counted on have failed us. Our heralded democracy seems to have welcomed
racism, xenophobia, hatred, and outright lying as accepted parts of the
process. Christianity itself is too often a tool of hatred, bigotry, and the
acquisition of power at any cost.
I
wonder if we sophisticated moderns don’t need to take the problem of evil more
seriously, even if we do not personify it. How else to explain school children
slaughtering classmates with easily obtained weapons of war? Or followers of
Jesus cheering war, spewing hate for those different from them, embracing lies,
immorality, and disdain for the least of these, in the pursuit of power?
How else to explain many of us swallowing
consumerism’s big lie that if we only acquire enough, if we only get more, we’ll
be truly happy? How else to explain turning childhood into a high-stress,
cut-throat competition where children must outduel others to get ahead, and we
are willing to sacrifice children with fewer advantages for the sake of our own?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)