Sermons and thoughts on faith on Scripture from my time at Old Presbyterian Meeting House and Falls Church Presbyterian Church, plus sermons and postings from "Pastor James," my blog while pastor at Boulevard Presbyterian in Columbus, OH.
Tuesday, October 15, 2019
Sunday, October 13, 2019
Sermon: In Their Shalom, You Will Find Yours
Jeremiah 29:1, 4-7
In Their Shalom, You Will Find Yours
James Sledge October
13, 2019
Has
the ground ever shifted under your feet, something you thought sure, permanent,
certain, unchanging, suddenly failed you? For much of the 20th
century, American factory workers assumed there would always be good,
high-paying manufacturing jobs with pensions for them and their children. But
then factories began to close, and jobs began to dry up.
On
a more personal level, someone you counted on, the one person you were certain
would always be there for you, suddenly betrays you. It could be a spouse, a
best friend, a child, a parent, but the trauma of such a betrayal can leave
people unmoored and at a loss for what to do next.
American
Christianity, or perhaps I should say, American churches have experienced the
ground shake under them as well. It happened more gradually than a factory
closing or a spouse leaving, but it has been no less devastating for many
congregations.
When
America sought a return to “normal” after World War II, church was assumed to
be a big part of that normal. As suburbs exploded in the 1950s, denominations put
scores of new churches in them. Mainline denominations like Presbyterians,
Lutherans, Methodists, and Episcopalians used a formula that almost always
worked. If we build it, they will come. People were “supposed” to go to church,
and so the new neighborhood churches easily found new members while existing
congregations built additions to handle all the people.
Those
were heady times for Presbyterians and others. We enjoyed significant influence
in the public square. Our seminaries were filled with bright young minds.
Denominational headquarters swelled and expanded. “The Protestant Hour” was
broadcast on over 600 radio stations nationwide, as well as on the Armed Forces
Network.
I
grew up assuming that you went to church on Sunday morning, unless you were
Jewish. It was a fairly safe assumption in 1960s South Carolina. Nothing much
else happened on Sunday morning. The stores and movie theaters were closed. The
pool didn’t open until after lunch, and no youth sports team even thought about
playing or practicing.
I
suspect that many congregations assumed it would always be so. The suburbs
would keep growing and so would the churches. We would keep building new
churches, keep holding worship services, and the people would keep streaming
in, encouraged by a culture that expected religious participation as a part of
American citizenship.
But
for many of you here today, such a world has never existed. You grew up with
Sunday soccer leagues, walk-a-thons, 5Ks, and other community events. Almost no
businesses closed on Sunday, and church was just one option in a plethora of
them.
Wednesday, October 9, 2019
Tuesday, October 8, 2019
Higher Loyalties
I recently had the honor of attending the promotion ceremony of a church member. (Congratulations, Colonel Balten!) At that ceremony, she once again took her military oath of office. I had heard it before, but I'm always struck when I do. Here it is.
Members of Congress, the President, Supreme Court justices, and so on take oaths to defend the constitution. They all pledge a higher loyalty than party or political gain, but in these highly partisan times, this higher loyalty is often difficult to detect. On occasion, the good of the nation overrides partisan interests, but those occasions seem to be more and more rare.
Our current president has added a new wrinkle to this problem by seemingly conflating loyalty to the nation and its ideals with loyalty to him personally. Perhaps this is simply a natural progression in the move away from a loyalty to higher principles toward smaller and smaller loyalties. And the smallest loyalty of all is one to self alone.
America's emphasis on individual freedoms and rights may at times encourage this problem, although our founding documents attempt to strike a balance between the good of the individual and the good of the whole. It's not a new problem though. In a letter to his congregation in Corinth, the Apostle Paul addresses members there whose personal freedoms and rights seem unconcerned with the good of others.
The issue in Corinth is eating meat that has been sacrificed in pagan temples, something forbidden by the Scripture (which for Paul and the first Christians was what we call the Old Testament). This might seem a minor problem but most meat at the butcher shop had started out as a sacrifice somewhere. Buying meat for supper risked violating the Law unless one was very careful.
But Paul said that through Jesus, he had been freed from the Law, and some Corinthians decided they could eat meat without a second thought. But others were bothered by this. In Monday's daily lectionary passage from 1 Corinthians 10:14-11:1, Paul addresses this conflict, writing, " 'All things are lawful,' but not all things are beneficial. 'All things are lawful,' but not all things build up. Do not seek your own advantage, but that of the other."
For Paul, the exercise of freedom or rights that would harm another is inconceivable. For Paul, freedom does not mean he gets to do what ever he wants. Paul has been freed for a new life "in Christ," a life that is profoundly for others, a life guided by Christ-like love as its highest loyalty.
As with politics, this fealty to a higher principle - in this case a love for others - is too often absent from American Christianity. Faith is often viewed in highly individualistic terms, almost like a consumer commodity. Faith, spirituality, belief, is something undertaken for personal benefit. This may be divine blessings, the promise of heaven, a spiritual buzz, or some other good. In its worst manifestations, it becomes almost totally focused on one's personal salvation, spiritual fulfillment, peace of mind, heavenly reward, etc. with little concern for others beyond a very limited sphere.
The guarantee of personal freedoms and rights is one of the real strengths of the founding principles of our nation. But those freedoms and rights were never intended to be absolutes, and when they become objects of ultimate loyalty, they are what Scripture calls "idols." The problem of idols is not a mechanical one, a danger from certain sorts of statues or images. The problem is one of loyalties, and the very human tendency to misplace our loyalties. The problem is perhaps even more acute among religious sorts for we are endlessly able to enlist our gods and beliefs in our personal causes, at which point we have converted our god into an idol.
There's a well worn quote from writer Anne Lamott that is well attuned to this problem of idol making. "You can safely assume you've created God in your own image when it turns our God hates all the same people you do." In other words, is your god loyal to you, or are you loyal to the God we meet in Jesus?
You can find the Daily Lectionary here.
I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.I find it remarkable that our military officers swear to support and defend not their service branch, not their leaders, military or civilian, not even the nation itself, but rather the ideals on which the nation is built. They swear to defend freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to peaceably protest, and more from "all enemies, foreign and domestic." The oath demands a loyalty to higher principles, and as such, it is aspirational. I doubt anyone is able to keep it perfectly. At times it surely comes in conflict with climbing the career ladder, obeying an order, etc. I do suspect, however, that many in the military come closer to upholding their oath than do some others in the service of our country.
Members of Congress, the President, Supreme Court justices, and so on take oaths to defend the constitution. They all pledge a higher loyalty than party or political gain, but in these highly partisan times, this higher loyalty is often difficult to detect. On occasion, the good of the nation overrides partisan interests, but those occasions seem to be more and more rare.
Our current president has added a new wrinkle to this problem by seemingly conflating loyalty to the nation and its ideals with loyalty to him personally. Perhaps this is simply a natural progression in the move away from a loyalty to higher principles toward smaller and smaller loyalties. And the smallest loyalty of all is one to self alone.
America's emphasis on individual freedoms and rights may at times encourage this problem, although our founding documents attempt to strike a balance between the good of the individual and the good of the whole. It's not a new problem though. In a letter to his congregation in Corinth, the Apostle Paul addresses members there whose personal freedoms and rights seem unconcerned with the good of others.
The issue in Corinth is eating meat that has been sacrificed in pagan temples, something forbidden by the Scripture (which for Paul and the first Christians was what we call the Old Testament). This might seem a minor problem but most meat at the butcher shop had started out as a sacrifice somewhere. Buying meat for supper risked violating the Law unless one was very careful.
But Paul said that through Jesus, he had been freed from the Law, and some Corinthians decided they could eat meat without a second thought. But others were bothered by this. In Monday's daily lectionary passage from 1 Corinthians 10:14-11:1, Paul addresses this conflict, writing, " 'All things are lawful,' but not all things are beneficial. 'All things are lawful,' but not all things build up. Do not seek your own advantage, but that of the other."
For Paul, the exercise of freedom or rights that would harm another is inconceivable. For Paul, freedom does not mean he gets to do what ever he wants. Paul has been freed for a new life "in Christ," a life that is profoundly for others, a life guided by Christ-like love as its highest loyalty.
As with politics, this fealty to a higher principle - in this case a love for others - is too often absent from American Christianity. Faith is often viewed in highly individualistic terms, almost like a consumer commodity. Faith, spirituality, belief, is something undertaken for personal benefit. This may be divine blessings, the promise of heaven, a spiritual buzz, or some other good. In its worst manifestations, it becomes almost totally focused on one's personal salvation, spiritual fulfillment, peace of mind, heavenly reward, etc. with little concern for others beyond a very limited sphere.
The guarantee of personal freedoms and rights is one of the real strengths of the founding principles of our nation. But those freedoms and rights were never intended to be absolutes, and when they become objects of ultimate loyalty, they are what Scripture calls "idols." The problem of idols is not a mechanical one, a danger from certain sorts of statues or images. The problem is one of loyalties, and the very human tendency to misplace our loyalties. The problem is perhaps even more acute among religious sorts for we are endlessly able to enlist our gods and beliefs in our personal causes, at which point we have converted our god into an idol.
There's a well worn quote from writer Anne Lamott that is well attuned to this problem of idol making. "You can safely assume you've created God in your own image when it turns our God hates all the same people you do." In other words, is your god loyal to you, or are you loyal to the God we meet in Jesus?
You can find the Daily Lectionary here.
Monday, October 7, 2019
Sunday, October 6, 2019
Sermon: Meeting God in Scripture: Enough Faith
Meeting God in Scripture: Enough Faith
James Sledge October
6, 2019
Over
the summer, I read a church-focused blog post on preaching entitled “Don’t
Start with the Bible.”[1] It
suggested bringing Scripture into a sermon only at the last possible moment, after
raising some issue, examining ways the culture is responding, and identifying
fruitful responses. Then and only then, connect the fruitful responses to Scripture.
The
author is concerned that starting with Scripture invites folks to tune out the
preacher because people don’t see the Bible as an authority. In fact, many view
Scripture with suspicion, an antiquated religious book with little connection
to their everyday lives.
I
can’t argue with that, but still, I’m inclined not to follow the blog’s
recommendation. Yes, there are difficulties. Some of you may view the Bible
with a degree of skepticism, and I would never expect to win any argument with,
“Well the Bible says so.” Yet in a time with so few cultural inducements or
expectations to attend church or be Christian, surely most people who do show
up are looking for something more than what they can find on their own. They
are hoping to find meaning or purpose not found from culture, from work or
hobbies or other experiences. They are hoping Church has something unique to offer.
The
Bible would seem ready made for this, a huge collection of stories, poetry,
imagery, regulations, teachings, letters, and more drawn from the various
experiences of the faith community over the centuries. All of these explore,
examine, and reflect on the encounters with and efforts to live in relationship
to the mystery we call God.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)