God Could Never Work Through Them

The gospel of Luke begins its story about Jesus by announcing a birth but not the birth of Jesus. Before we hear of Mary and Joseph, we meet Elizabeth and Zechariah. We learn that they are both righteous before God and blameless with regard to keeping God's commandments. "But they had no children, because Elizabeth was barren, and both were getting on in years."

In our day, this inability to have children may seem no more than an unfortunate, perhaps even tragic, medical condition. But in ancient times, an inability to have children was always the woman's fault, it basically robbed her of her only valid purpose in life, and it was thought to be a punishment of some sort. Some god was involved in closing a woman's womb and rendering her barren. This happened for some reason.

I can only assume that people talked about Elizabeth and Zechariah, speculating about what one of them had done to tick off God. Zechariah was a priest, so maybe it was Elizabeth's fault. Yet Luke tells us quite clearly, "Both of them were righteous before God, living blamelessly according to all the commandments and regulations of the Lord."

Modern folk are less likely to blame God's personal activity for every event and misfortune, especially if we understand the scientific process behind the event. But that doesn't mean we don't make assumptions about who deserves what. We may even hope for some people to get what's coming to them, wishing for karma, the universe, or perhaps even God to intervene and set things right.

But Luke opens his gospel by knocking over basic assumptions about karma, justice, and people getting what they deserve. A righteous and blameless couple seems to have incurred God's wrath. By all appearances, God is against them, and yet the story of Jesus begins by telling of their critical place in God's plan to save and renew.

You needed by a conservative fundamentalist to think you know who God prefers and who God would and wouldn't use as part of God's plan. I was once at a church conference populated mostly by Presbyterians, many of them of a more moderate or liberal ilk. The speaker was Brian McLaren, and at some point he made a comment about there being things we Mainline Christians could learn from our more evangelical brothers and sisters. The visceral reaction from a great many was astounding to me. It all but said out loud, "God cannot possibly work through such folks. They have offensive views and bad theology. Surely that disqualifies them."

Some of the recent furor over an interview given by Duck Dynasty star, Phil Robertson, is perhaps instructive. I think what he said is completely wrong, but that doesn't mean that he is the anti-Christ as some Facebook posts or Tweets would seem to suggest. And it doesn't meant that this person is now so tainted that he cannot be a disciple of Jesus. He may be a flawed and misinformed one, but then again that probably describes all of us in some way.

Some years ago, Tom Long preached a sermon at a Covenant Network of Presbyterians conference where he told of meeting a hairdresser who was a member of Creflo Dollar's mega church in Atlanta. He laughted to himself about how he was going to get some bad theology to go with his bad haircut, but then he discovered through their conversation that God at work in this woman, and in Creflo Dollar's church. (You may be able to find the sermon via Google or on the Covenant Network website. It's truly wonderful.)

I think one thing we can say with absolute certainty is that God rarely acts in quite the manner we would have done it. The cross alone is sufficient confirmation of that. And so as we draw toward the end of Advent and near to the celebration of a Savior's birth, perhaps we should be especially attentive to surprises that are contrary to our assumptions. Perhaps we should be a tad suspicious of our well constructed doctrines and theologies, designed by the most learned and scholarly sorts. After all, the first person in Luke's gospel who begins to expound on the character and intentions of God is a teenage girl (Luke 1:46-55). And she didn't even have a seminary degree.

Click to learn more about the lectionary.

Sermon video: Are You the One?

Audios of worship and sermons available on FCPC website.

Harold Camping and Being Ready for God's New Day

Today's Washington Post contained an obituary for Harold Camping. If the name doesn't ring a bell, he was a radio evangelist who caused quite a stir in 2011 with his predictions of the world's end. His radio company spent millions advertising the event, buying ads on 5000 billboards around the country. Add in the all the free advertising he got via the new media and on the internet, and his predictions likely created a bigger stir than any before. Many of his followers reportedly sold their homes and gave Camping's ministry the proceeds to help publicize the impending judgment day.

It's rather striking that Mr. Camping's obituary (he died on Sunday) appeared on the day when the gospel reading speaks of the end times. I assume that Camping had read these words spoken by Jesus, but he apparently had some reason for ignoring them. "But about that day and hour no one knows, neither the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father."

Quite understandably, we humans prefer to have advance notice for big events. We like to make plans and prepare. Right now we are in the midst of the season that likely includes more planning and preparation than any other. Whether it's the religious or the secular observance of Christmas (or the hybrid many of us do), there is a flurry of activity this time of year. I suspect more energy goes into Christmas preparations than any other event at church, many homes, or the malls. Of course we know the exact date when all this culminates. There is no mystery about that at all.

But Jesus insists there will be no time for elaborate preparations when God's new day arrives in full. It will be impossible to miss, but until then folks will be engaged in normal, day to day activity. Therefore we have to remain at the ready.

Very often this gets interpreted to mean some sort of religious hyper-vigilance, but I do not thing that at all what Jesus means. If you continue reading beyond today's verses, Jesus continues to teach, but our tendency to chop up scripture into small bit for easier preaching and teaching often obscures the connection to what comes before and/or after. Today's reading is part of a single teaching that takes up all of Mathew 24 and 25. That means that Jesus finishes his teachings on being wide awake and ready with parables about boldly using our gifts for God's purposes, and about how caring for people in need is the same as ministering directly to Jesus.

In other words, being alert and ready has nothing to do with staring off at heaven, eagerly anticipating Jesus' return. Instead it is about living lives of faithful discipleship, risking ourselves for the sake Jesus' work, and seeing those in need as thought they were Jesus himself. "Be about this work I have given you," Jesus says, "and you will be ready."

That seems so mundane. Do your job; do your duty; share the gospel in word and deed. Shouldn't there be a big festival? Shouldn't we plan a cantata and a big party? But apparently God's new day will come without much more hoopla than when Jesus first arrived.

Do you job; be disciples; love God and love neighbor; bring good news to the poor; pray for your enemies; minister to "the least of these." Something to remember and guide us when all the Christmas hoopla is over.

Click to learn more about the lectionary.

Sermon: Are You the One?

Matthew 11:2-11

Are You the One?

James Sledge                                                               December 15, 2013 – Advent 3

“Are you the one who is to come, or are we to wait for another?” What a strange question, at least it is coming from John the Baptist. When Jesus came to be baptized by him in the Jordan River, John had initially refused. “I need to be baptized by you,” he protested. Jesus was the one he had foretold, the one who would baptize with the Holy Spirit. Why on earth would John baptize him. But Jesus had insisted, saying it was necessary “to fulfill all righteousness,” and John had relented. Now however, John seems to be having second thoughts. Maybe Jesus was not who John thought he was, who he hoped he was.

Have you ever been really sure about something, only to doubt or even regret it later? I may have told you before about a seminary classmate whose call to become a pastor led him to go back to college to finish his degree so he could be accepted at seminary. Then he flunked out in his first semester at seminary. I don’t know what happened to him after that, but I’d be surprised if  he still felt called.

In today’s economy there are many who went to college and pursued a degree, assuming that it would lead them to a good and rewarding career. But now such hopes seem to have evaporated, and they may wonder about or regret their earlier choices.

Six years ago, people bought houses, certain that the value would only go up. The nation elected a black president and hoped that this meant we had turned a corner on racism and entered a new era. But if anything, racist attitudes seem to have been inflamed.

The list goes on and on: the coach who will finally turn our team around or the politician who will change the way Washington works. On a personal level there is that acquisition that will make us happy, content, cool, or hip, and there is that new job that is perfect and will leave us fulfilled and rewarded. But things don’t always work out like we had hoped.

John the Baptist had felt a call from God. He was supposed to get people ready for something wonderful and new. God was about to change everything, and people needed to prepare, to repent, to clean the slate so they join in this new thing. A Messiah was coming who would toss out the corrupt leaders at the Jerusalem Temple, who would lift up the  oppressed, make sure Herod got what was coming to him, and restore Israel to its former glory. As John said about this Messiah to those who came for baptism, “His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor and will gather his wheat into the granary; but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire.” Something’s a ‘coming , folks, and you’d better get ready.

But now John was in prison, wondering what Herod would eventually do with him. As John awaited his fate, he surely knew it would not end well. And nothing he had expected seemed to be happening. Herod was still in power. Rome was still in power. The Temple priests were still in power, and the world didn’t look any different. No wonder he sent some of his followers to ask Jesus, “Are you the one?”

Taking Christmas Out of Church

Today's Old Testament reading is from the prophet Amos, and it is a full blown oracle of judgment against God's people. The problem is not a failure to be religious. The folks in Jerusalem were apparently quite good at that, but as God says a few chapters earlier, "I hate, I despise your festivals, and I take no delight in your solemn assemblies... Take away from me the noise of your songs; I will not listen to the melody of your harps." I'm reasonably certain this had nothing to do with the musical quality of the performance, and today's passage makes clear where the problem lies.

     Hear this, you that trample on the needy,
     and bring to ruin the poor of the land,

     saying, "When will the new moon be over
     so that we may sell grain;
     and the sabbath,
     so that we may offer wheat for sale?
     We will make the ephah small and the shekel great,
     and practice deceit with false balances,
     buying the poor for silver
     and the needy for a pair of sandals,
     and selling the sweepings of the wheat."

Amos' and other prophets' disgust for those who faithfully go to church while participating in social systems that oppress the poor and weak is well known, if frequently ignored. But as I read today's passage, I was struck by people's longing for new moon and sabbath to be over so they could get back to commerce. What a different world from ours. I have no desire to go back to the trivialized sabbath keeping of my southern childhood, and it clearly didn't help the people Amos condemns, but the notion that there are things more important than commerce might be a refreshing one.

I think of this especially in this season of Advent which has been taken over by a frenzy of Christmas commerce. Don't worry, I'm not going to launch into a rant about the commercialization of Christmas. The very phrase, "commercialization of Christmas" sounds as though commerce invaded and occupied something sacred, but I don't think that happened at all. This is one of those classic cases of meeting the enemy, and it is us.

In a society preoccupied with possessions and consumer goods, the joy of Christmas has become about getting stuff. For some reason, the church felt it couldn't afford to miss out on all the frenetic energy surrounding this economic extravaganza, and so it welcomed a consumer Christmas into its observance of Advent. Christmas trees got put in sanctuaries at the beginning of December, often with wrapped presents beneath them. (That some insist these are "Chrismon" rather than Christmas trees reveals a certain suspicion of our own practice here.)

Once our consumerist Christmas sufficiently replaced Advent, it became increasingly difficult to discriminate between what belongs to the faith and what to the secular celebration. In a few congregations, there seems to be an only slightly more classy version of the Christmas decorations in front yards where inflatable Frosty, Santa, elves, candy canes, and reindeer share space with a plastic nativity.

In the midst of such confusion, I suppose it is to be expected that "Happy Holidays" and "Merry Christmas" would mark some sort of religious fault line. The consumer driven Christmas has become so interwoven with Advent that if the commercial side of the operation drops its Christian moniker, it does indeed threaten the cultural buzz and energy with which we have replaced Advent waiting and reflection. I wonder what the prophet Amos would think of it all.

If at this point you were to surmise that I don't like Christmas trees, lighted houses, or Christmas music a the mall, you would be wrong. I also enjoy the nostalgia that is so connected to Christmas in our culture, right down to watching Jimmy Stewart in It's a Wonderful Life. But I do think the church needs to rethink its association with it. (I like the Fourth of July but think the church does well when it doesn't make that a big part of our worship.) If that makes me a curmudgeon, so be it. 

Have a blessed Advent and a Happy Holidays. I'll wish you a Merry Christmas in a couple of weeks.

Click to learn more about the lectionary.

False Gods, Fox News, and Radical Love

Fox News is upset that President Obama shook hands with Raul Castro at the memorial service for Nelson Mandela. As a good southern boy, my momma taught me to shake hands when you meet someone. It's the polite thing to do, whether you particularly like the person or not. And so when Fox starts fussing about this sort of thing, I have to imagine that it doesn't much matter what the president does, Fox will find something wrong with it.

In that very limited sense (I'm not comparing Obama to Jesus, just comparing Fox to his narrow minded opponents), Fox News functions a bit like the Sadducees and Pharisees in today's gospel. These opponents have already made their judgments about Jesus. They "know" they are right and are only interested in making Jesus look bad. And so they ask questions, not to learn anything, but in hopes of catching Jesus in a mistake. It's not unlike our political scene today, and people on the left and the right are equally skilled at this game.

The Pharisees' mean-spirited questioning produces one of Jesus better known statements, but nothing he says is original. He is asked about "the law" and his answer quotes from that law, in this case from Deuteronomy 6:5 and Leviticus 19:18. To paraphrase, Jesus says, "Love God with every fiber or your being, and love your neighbor as yourself." And then he adds, "On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets."

For a Jew such as Jesus, "the law and the prophets" was shorthand for the bulk of what Christians call the Old Testament. This also spoke of what it meant to live in covenant relationship with God. Jesus is asked for a single commandment, but he will not stop with one. For Jesus, loving God cannot be separated from loving those around us, and anyone who imagines that a personal relationship with God (or with Jesus for that matter) can happen without it transforming social relationships is sadly mistaken.

Loving neighbor as self gets a lot of lip service from both Christians and non-Christians, but I'm not sure we reflect very much on what it actually means. To love others as myself means that my needs, wants, and desires are no more important than those of the neighbor, the other. This of course means that the needs of my family, or my community, or my nation, are not more important than those of other families, communities, or nations. But despite how easily we have slapped the Judeo-Christian label on our American culture, we've never really imagined that our national neighbors counted nearly so much as we do.

The call to love one's neighbor has nothing to do with warm and fuzzy sentimentalism. Jesus is not saying that I must have sweet, warm feelings toward everyone, no matter how they act or what they do. But he is saying that I must have their best interest at heart, just as much as I have my own. That clearly would preclude the sort of pettiness that Fox News is so good at, as well as the pettiness that marks a lot of politically motivated action from conservatives and liberals alike.

But I can't stop there. There are plenty of reasons for the rapid rise of the "Nones" in American religious life, people whose respond, "None of the above" when asked for a religious preference. Some reasons are external to church and faith and beyond our control. But failure of so many Christians to embody what Jesus insists is at the core of a faithful life surely has done tremendous damage to our image. Fox News and a cadre of religious conservatives are often prime examples of a pettiness and an "us versus them" mentality that seems devoid of any love or real concern for the other. However, this cannot be said of all religious conservatives, and such behavior is hardly restricted to conservatives.

The arrogance of some liberal Christians and their total dismissal of conservatives and evangelicals as dimwitted Neanderthals can be something to behold. And if you have enough liberal, Christian "friends" on Facebook, you will see more than enough posts featuring character assassination and out-of-context quotes to make you wonder if Fox News has switched sides. It seems that neither the left nor the right has quite realized what a radical thing it is to love your neighbor as yourself.

All ideologies - right, left, and everything in between - are false gods when they garner too much trust, hope, or loyalty. Christians should be very suspicious of those who cannot step outside of their ideology. If an ideology is the highest authority in someone's life, then it is that person's idol, his or her god, no matter what faith may be formally professed. That so many Christians on both left and right confuse their ideology with God has a great deal to do with the church's current low public esteem.

Much of the current fascination with Pope Francis is precisely because he seems an exception to this. He appears more captive to Jesus' gospel of love than to any ideology. He has a quite conservative theology on a number of social issues, but his loyalty to Jesus seems paramount. As a good Protestant, I understand the pope as a sinful human who is a debtor to God's grace, but I also see him as one whose faithfulness is an inspiration, demonstrating something of the radical nature of loving neighbor as self.

So too, Nelson Mandela seemed to understand something of what it means and requires to love the other as oneself. Though not a religious figure per se, he embodied Jesus' command in a way that few have. That he was able to stay focused on the best interests of his nation as a whole, including those who had tortured him and imprisoned him for nearly 30 years, speaks volumes about a loyalty to love that trumped ideology.

"You shall love your neighbor as yourself." Jesus says this commandment is "like" the one on loving God. If that is so, then any concern for "getting right with God" must be matched by a concern for getting right with the neighbor. Have we really thought about what a radical idea that is?

Click to learn more about the lectionary.

Sermon: Sacred Remembering

Matthew 3:1-12

Sacred Remembering

James Sledge                                                               December 8, 2013 – Advent 2

“Repent, for the kingdom of heaven has come near.” So says John when he appears in the wilderness. Repent has a scary sound to it, but Jesus says exactly the same thing. After John is arrested, Jesus moves from Nazareth to Capernaum and begins his public ministry, repeating word for word what John had said, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven has come near.” It somehow sounds different when John says it, less inviting in a way. He sounds too much like street preachers and tent revivalist who use “Repent” as an accusation.

Quite literally, the word John and Jesus use means to change one’s mind, with implications of turning away from something that you once thought a good idea, but now see differently. Before the word became an almost exclusively religious one, it could be used without some of the accusatory sense we may hear. In such usage, you could be headed out on a trip, realize you were on the wrong highway, and repent of the directions you were following. And in fact, there a few places in the Old Testament where God repents. In the book of Jonah, God “repents” of plans to destroy Nineveh.

Our gospel reading connects John’s message of repentance to his identity as one spoken of by the prophet Isaiah. “The voice of one crying out in the wilderness: ‘Prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.’ ” According to both Jesus and John, repenting is critical to preparing for God’s new day, the kingdom that has drawn near.

Advent is a season of preparation and expectation. A lot of getting ready goes on this time of year. Choirs prepare special music. Houses and churches get decorated. Special worship services are prepared. Presents are bought and wrapped. Travel plans are made.

There are some big events in our lives, things that require planning and preparation, that point toward big changes coming. Think of all the work and planning that goes into to a college graduation or a wedding. Or consider a couple about to have their first child and all they must do to get ready. They need a crib, a stroller, baby clothes, and so on. And this getting ready is only a beginning. It starts this couple down a road that, for better or worse, will be vastly different from one without children.

What will change as a result of your Advent preparations? Do they start you on a new and different path? How will things be different come January, when all the special services are over, the presents all opened, and the decorations all put away?

Faithful Servants and Wicked Tenants

I just saw the news that Nelson Mandela has died. It is indeed a momentous passing. It is hard to overstate the witness of his life, from all he endured and suffered in the struggle against apartheid to the remarkable humility and grace with which he took up the reins of power. If ever it could be said, "Well done, good and faithful servant..."

As I reflect on this, I am acutely aware of how easy my life has been, how petty my concerns and problems are, yet how hard it often is for me to do what I know is right. And the parable Jesus tells in today's gospel only heightens this awareness.

The "Parable of the Wicked Tenants" is directed at chief priests and elders, the leaders of Temple Judaism, the Church of that day. Jesus is abundantly clear that these leaders have failed in their calling, operating the religious structures more for their own benefit rather than serving God. And I can't help but wonder; what sort of parable would Jesus tell to me and to leaders of the Church in our day?

Read through the gospels and listen to Jesus' teachings. Hear the sort of life he calls his followers to live - suffering for the sake of others, praying for enemies, inviting the poor and destitute into our homes, not worrying about possessions of money but focusing on God's coming rule, doing God's will even when it is terribly difficult and costly - then wonder how likely Jesus would be to say to me or you, "Well done, good and faithful servant."

Very often the church is focused on serving its members and leaders, and the work Jesus calls us to is a small, sometimes insignificant piece of a congregation's life. It is common for churches with million dollar budgets to spend well under $100,000 on others, on the work Jesus calls us to do. We may not be corrupt like the tenants in Jesus' parable, but neither are we much focused on what Jesus calls us to do.

MaryAnn McKibben Dana had an interesting blog post the other day on the 'beyond repair" status of the Christian "brand." I wonder if this 'beyond repair" situation describes a great deal of what is labeled "church" by those of us who grew up in traditional, Mainline congregations that reached their zenith in the 1950s. If Jesus returned and gazed upon the many beautiful church buildings that dot the American landscape, would he give their congregations a "Well done," or would he instead say something about not one stone being left upon another?

Thankfully, with God there is much grace, yet still the Advent call rings out, "Prepare the way of the Lord. Repent, for the kingdom of heaven has come near."

Click to learn more about the lectionary.

A Higher Authority

The particular events of American history have made us rather inclined to question authority. There are theological roots to this, Presbyterian/Reformed worries about sin that led to division of power in different branches of government so that power isn't overly concentrated in one place. Add to that a strong tendency toward individualism and personal freedom, and authority is further called into question. No doubt there are times when this suspicion of authority is a great strength in our society. But great strengths are usually roots of great weaknesses also, and our inability to recognize authority we don't like or agree with accounts for some of the partisan gridlock and chaos in Washington.

Jesus gets asked about his authority in today's gospel. As so often happens, Jesus answers a question with another question, querying his opponents about what authority lay behind the ministry of John the Baptist. Jesus' question demands that his opponents reveal what authority they do recognize, but they cannot do that, and they refuse to answer.

What authority do we recognize? In the season of Advent we say we are getting ready for the king who is coming, but to have  king is to respect the authority of that royal power. But most Christians, both on the left and right, fashion Jesus to suit themselves. We embrace the Jesus we agree with and reject the one who challenges us. In the end, we declare the real authority we recognize: our reason and intelligence, our personal preferences, our ambitions, or our desires. If Jesus does not cohere with some or all of these, we won't accept his authority or do as he says.

Soon we will sing of a king that is born, a lord who has come, a Savior who reigns. But will we allow this king to change us, to transform us into the children of God we are meant to be? Or will we insist that he recognize that we are the ones who are truly in charge?

Click to learn more about the lectionary.

I Trust in God, but...

A king is not saved by his great army;
     a warrior is not delivered by his great strength. 
The war horse is a vain hope for victory,
     and by its great might it cannot save. 
Truly the eye of the LORD is on those who fear him,
    on those who hope in his steadfast love, 
to deliver their soul from death,
     and to keep them alive in famine.
Our soul waits for the LORD;
     he is our help and shield. 
Our heart is glad in him,
     because we trust in his holy name. 
Let your steadfast love, O LORD, be upon us,
    even as we hope in you.          Psalm 33:16-22

I wonder if the psalmist really believed the words he wrote. After all, Israel had warriors and horses and chariots and weapons of war. And being a rather small and insignificant kingdom, they also made military alliances with stronger powers. God is our help and shield. Really?

I'm not picking on the ancient Israelites. Many in our country and in our country's history have claimed that the US is the new bearer of God's blessings and covenant, the new Jerusalem. But some of the most ardent Christians are also the most ardent supporters of large military budgets along with the "right to bear arms" so that we can protect ourselves. God is our help and shield?

I trust in God, but... I presume that almost every honest person of faith (emphasis on honest) can finish this sentence with multiple buts and excepts. We trust in God, but only so far. And most of us tend to trust in ourselves or in the things we and others can do more than in God. In the modern world, most Christians have relegated God and trusting God to a narrower and narrower slice of life. For many, God isn't to be trusted with anything more that what  happens to us when we die. No wonder so many find Christian faith not worth their time.

I make no claims to be a big exception to this. I struggle to trust God as much as the next person. I manage to here and there, but I fail to do so regularly. But I have also discovered something over the years. At those times when I trust most in myself, in my abilities and skills and whatever else I think impressive about me, I inevitably find myself in trouble. And I find myself back before God, a little sheepishly, trying to lay claim to the hopes of the psalmist.

In Advent, as we once again remember and rehearse ancient stories, we might do well to remember that we are getting ready for the one who could trust himself completely to God, and who calls us to follow him. Especially among more "progressive" Christians like myself, Advent is a good time to refocus on the person of Jesus, on this one who does trust and who comes to show us his way of trusting.

Click to learn more about the lectionary.

C and E Christians

I am apparently in a significant minority of pastors in that I tend to prepare sermons well in advance. I usually complete a sermon just over a week before it is preached. That means that right now I am reading in Matthew about John the Baptist's second thoughts on Jesus. John had almost refused to baptize Jesus, saying it should be the other way around. But now John is in prison, and he seems less certain. "Are you the one who is to come, or are we to wait for another?"

I can only assume that John had expected things to change more than they had. He expected the Messiah's arrival to rework the world and its structures in some way, but things still looked the same. Maybe Jesus wasn't the one after all.

We're a long way removed from John, and so his disappointments may not be ours. Our Christian faith has lived for a long time with a world slow to come around to God's ways, and so we may not be so acutely disappointed as the Baptist. But we still have to deal with all those promises of a kingdom drawn near, good news to the poor, and peace and goodwill. If we've always been Christian, we may simply shy away from John's question and instead operate with greatly lowered expectations of Jesus.

Today's lectionary gospel reading is Matthew's account of Palm Sunday, and I found myself thinking about how the tendency to rush from "Hosanna" to "He is risen" may, in some way, parallel the way Advent has been swallowed up by Christmas. Granted, Advent as Christmas may spring largely from the secular, consumerist, economic focus on Christmas while jumping straight from palms to Easter lilies is more about avoiding the ugliness of the cross. Still, both seem to focus on a happy event to avoid looking at something else.

The term "C and E Christians" is sometimes used to disparage church members who only show up a couple times a year, but I'm using it differently here. I refer to the much larger group of us that focuses on Christmas and Easter so that we don't have to consider some more troubling questions. Skipping over betrayal, arrest, trial and execution on a cross as we hurry to celebrate Easter not only avoids the messiness of the cross, but it also avoids Jesus' call for us to take up that cross as well. And spending so much time and energy celebrating Jesus' birth, on a babe in a manger, allow us to bask in the warmth of God's love, or at least in the warmth of a wonderful, old story, without needing to consider just who this baby is and what his coming demands of us.

But when we engage in a bit of Advent, we are again faced with John's (and perhaps our own) question. "Are you the one?" No need to ask that of a baby. We can imagine and mold the baby Jesus into whatever sort of Messiah we want. But Advent keeps asking who this baby is, what he will bring, and how we must prepare to be a part of that.

No doubt it is easier, certainly less costly, to be a C and E Christian. (Dietrich Bonhoeffer's "cheap grace" comes to mind here.) But I feel fairly certain that any faith with power to transform and make new can't be all C and E. With apologies to the musical Mame, maybe we really "need a little Advent, right this very minute."

Click to learn more about the lectionary.

Sermon video: Awake and Ready

Audios of sermons and worship available on FCPC website.