Luke 1:5-55
God’s Possibility: Poem Versus Memo
James Sledge December
7, 2014 – Advent 2
It’s
a most improbable story. An old woman and her equally old husband, childless
for years, long since having given up hope of children, will have a son. Despite
the word of the angel Gabriel, Zechariah cannot believe such a thing. And so he
finds himself mute, divine confirmation of the angel’s promise.
A
teenage girl, not yet married and still a virgin, visited by the same angel and
told she will have a child who will be Son of the Most High and restore the
throne of David for all time. “Impossible,” thinks Mary, but the angel tells
her that the power of God will make it so, and Mary becomes the model disciple,
responding to this improbable story with “Here am I, the servant of the Lord. Let it
be with me according to your word.”
And
the improbable story continues. The young girl goes to visit the old woman, and
both become prophets, declaring the new thing that God is about to do and is
doing. “(God) has brought down the powerful from their
thrones, and lifted up the lowly.
Imagine
that when Abby got up to sing a few moments ago she hadn’t sung verses from a
hymnal but instead startling new words about what God is about to do and is
doing. What if she sang of God bringing down one percenters and lifting up
minimum wage workers, illegal immigrants, and crowds shouting “I can’t breathe”?
What if she insisted that God would do this new thing through her? Who among us
would believe her?
Who
is going to take the word of a teenage girl all that seriously? Have you ever
been at a school board meeting when a middle school girl spoke. People smile
and mentally pat her on the head but don’t pay that much attention. She’s just
a middle school girl, after all.
Of
course, many of us don’t take improbable biblical stories all that seriously.
Elderly women having children, a virgin birth? Ancient stories from ancient,
pre-scientific, unsophisticated people who could believe in gods impregnating
young women. And we smile and mentally pat the gospel writer on the head. It’s
just an ancient story, after all.
One
of the nasty tricks that the modern, scientific age played on us, from the most
liberal Christians to the most literal fundamentalists, was convincing us that
“truth” is about facts, figures, logic, and what really happened.
Heavily seasoned with Greek philosophy, the modern era elevated science and reason and facts and figures above other sorts of knowledge. Quite a few biblical stories couldn’t be “true” by such standards, and in response, Christians tended to go one of two ways. Some resorted to a fundamentalism that assumes science and history are wrong even while accepting the modern, scientific definition of truth. Others accepted the scientific truth of evolution and the Big Bang while claiming that the Bible and faith dealt with a different sort of truth. I clearly fall more into the latter camp, but this view often comes with some pretty arrogant assumptions.
Heavily seasoned with Greek philosophy, the modern era elevated science and reason and facts and figures above other sorts of knowledge. Quite a few biblical stories couldn’t be “true” by such standards, and in response, Christians tended to go one of two ways. Some resorted to a fundamentalism that assumes science and history are wrong even while accepting the modern, scientific definition of truth. Others accepted the scientific truth of evolution and the Big Bang while claiming that the Bible and faith dealt with a different sort of truth. I clearly fall more into the latter camp, but this view often comes with some pretty arrogant assumptions.