Sermons and thoughts on faith on Scripture from my time at Old Presbyterian Meeting House and Falls Church Presbyterian Church, plus sermons and postings from "Pastor James," my blog while pastor at Boulevard Presbyterian in Columbus, OH.
Saturday, November 19, 2016
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Trump Is President/Jesus Is King?
I've seen a number of Internet memes that are variations on this theme, "No Matter Who Is President, Jesus Is King." I won't argue with the sentiment. This coming Sunday many Christians will celebrate Christ the King, and the phrase "Jesus is Lord" is one of the most ancient and basic Christian faith statements. But what exactly does it mean so say that Jesus is King/Lord?
I could add that we Presbyterians, as part of the Reformed/Calvinist family, are really big on the sovereignty of God. No matter how things may seem, God is ultimately in charge, in control. But again the question of exactly what this means and how it works remains.
But back to the Internet memes, it isn't always clear what comfort is to be taken from those posts about Jesus as Lord or King. Some seem to imply that we shouldn't worry because whatever happens in this life/world doesn't matter very much. Others seem to say "Don't worry. Jesus has got this." Perhaps other reassurance is intended. I don't know, but I know I don't much care for either of these two options.
The very fact that Jesus entered into human history, healed those who were sick and hurting, and had compassion for their earthly difficulties shows that God is concerned with history, with plain old, run of the mill, human existence. Jesus teaches us to pray that God's will be done here on earth. To say that Jesus is Lord can't possibly mean that earthly events have no real importance.
But if we go to the other end and speak of Jesus' lordship meaning, "Everything will be okay," we have to deal with countless times in history when Jesus' lordship and God's sovereignty provide no deterrent to unspeakable evil being committed. The Holocaust, millions killed by Stalin, the evils of slavery, and the genocide of Native Americans barely scratch the surface of the horrors humans have committed. That Jesus is Lord/King clearly doesn't mean that things turn out well for everyone. But does this lead us back to option one? Hopefully we can say something more than, "Life is crappy, and then you die. But then it gets better."
I could add that we Presbyterians, as part of the Reformed/Calvinist family, are really big on the sovereignty of God. No matter how things may seem, God is ultimately in charge, in control. But again the question of exactly what this means and how it works remains.
But back to the Internet memes, it isn't always clear what comfort is to be taken from those posts about Jesus as Lord or King. Some seem to imply that we shouldn't worry because whatever happens in this life/world doesn't matter very much. Others seem to say "Don't worry. Jesus has got this." Perhaps other reassurance is intended. I don't know, but I know I don't much care for either of these two options.
The very fact that Jesus entered into human history, healed those who were sick and hurting, and had compassion for their earthly difficulties shows that God is concerned with history, with plain old, run of the mill, human existence. Jesus teaches us to pray that God's will be done here on earth. To say that Jesus is Lord can't possibly mean that earthly events have no real importance.
But if we go to the other end and speak of Jesus' lordship meaning, "Everything will be okay," we have to deal with countless times in history when Jesus' lordship and God's sovereignty provide no deterrent to unspeakable evil being committed. The Holocaust, millions killed by Stalin, the evils of slavery, and the genocide of Native Americans barely scratch the surface of the horrors humans have committed. That Jesus is Lord/King clearly doesn't mean that things turn out well for everyone. But does this lead us back to option one? Hopefully we can say something more than, "Life is crappy, and then you die. But then it gets better."
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
If you look up the gospel reading for Christ the King Sunday, it features Jesus on the cross. Not exactly most people's image of a king. Surely this idea of a crucified King has to influence our notions of his kingdom, yet I'm not sure that has often been the case. More often we've imagined Jesus as a king who looks little different from earthly ones other than the addition of divine powers. In other words, we've turned him right back into the sort of king some who rejected him 2000 years ago wanted him to be.
Following similar logic, the Church has often been an imitator of human empire and power. Roman Catholics, who've been around since the days of Roman emperors, have buildings and vestments and ecclesiastical structure that would fit right in with an empire. We Protestants, because we've only been around for 500 years or so, have more modern and sometimes democratic trappings of power. We Presbyterians have a somewhat federalist looking denominational system which springs in part from our theology, but is also about power and control.
In the recent election, evangelicals largely supported Trump, not because he was one of them, but because he was seen as a way back into power. Many liberal Christians are in depression over Trump's election, at least in part because it means a loss of power. Both evangelical and liberal Christians say we follow Jesus, but neither of us is much enamored with his way of exercising power. Neither or us in much inclined to suffer for following Jesus.
I say this in full awareness of my own middle-class, white privilege where it generally possible to avoid suffering if I choose. I know that is not true for others, and I do not say to people who are oppressed or persecuted to embrace it as the way of Christ. I am speaking to those on the left and the right who relish the power we have and who dread the thought of losing it.
There is a line in the opening constitutional statements of my denomination speaking on the Church as the body of Christ that reads, "The Church is to be a community of faith, entrusting itself to God alone, even at the risk of losing its life." I think that articulates very well the way of Jesus and what it would mean to have Christ as King and Lord. I love the theology it expresses. But on some level, my paycheck is dependent on not living this out. And therein lies the problem.
Click to learn more about the lectionary.
In the recent election, evangelicals largely supported Trump, not because he was one of them, but because he was seen as a way back into power. Many liberal Christians are in depression over Trump's election, at least in part because it means a loss of power. Both evangelical and liberal Christians say we follow Jesus, but neither of us is much enamored with his way of exercising power. Neither or us in much inclined to suffer for following Jesus.
I say this in full awareness of my own middle-class, white privilege where it generally possible to avoid suffering if I choose. I know that is not true for others, and I do not say to people who are oppressed or persecuted to embrace it as the way of Christ. I am speaking to those on the left and the right who relish the power we have and who dread the thought of losing it.
There is a line in the opening constitutional statements of my denomination speaking on the Church as the body of Christ that reads, "The Church is to be a community of faith, entrusting itself to God alone, even at the risk of losing its life." I think that articulates very well the way of Jesus and what it would mean to have Christ as King and Lord. I love the theology it expresses. But on some level, my paycheck is dependent on not living this out. And therein lies the problem.
Click to learn more about the lectionary.
Sunday, November 13, 2016
Sermon: Agents of the Gospel
Luke 21:5-19
Agents of the Gospel
James Sledge November
13, 2016
I
attended what was then known as Union Theological Seminary in Richmond, now
called Union Presbyterian Seminary. Like me, most of my classmates were Presbyterian,
but a sizeable minority came from other traditions. One of these was a young
pastor already serving on the staff of a large church in a denomination that didn’t
require its pastors to have a seminary education, but encouraged it.
One
day in class he shared something that was creating a faith crisis for many in
his congregation. A young child had a
serious, life threatening disease. The congregation had rallied to support the
family, providing meals, caring for the other children so the parents could
spend time at the hospital, and so on. They had also organized a prayer
campaign. People signed up to ensure that someone was praying for this child at
all hours of the day.
The
members of this church put a lot of stock in prayer. They used phrases like
“prayer warriors,” a term you rarely hear in congregations such as ours. Many
of them were convinced that if they prayed faithfully and diligently, truly
believing and trusting in God, the child would be healed. But the child was
getting worse.
When
my classmate shared this, the church staff had begun to discuss how they were
going to handle the child’s imminent death. What were they going to say to
those who had responded to the call for prayer warriors, who had trusted that
God would intervene? How were they as the pastoral staff going to help people
hold onto faith when an article of that faith had let them down?
I
suspect that most of us have had, or will have, moments where the things we
count on fail us. Even for those who are not particularly religious, there are
objects of trust that are presumed to provide happiness, meaning, fulfillment,
hope, etc. People may or may not equate such things with God, but when they
fail to produce what was promised or hoped for, it can create a kind of faith
crisis.
I’m sure there are people here today who
had hoped, even trusted, that America was on a path to becoming more tolerant
and welcoming of diversity. We had elected our first black president, twice,
and would soon have our first female president. Many were sure that America had
made too much progress to elect someone who engaged in openly misogynist
behavior and whose rhetoric inspired racists. But for those with such faith,
Tuesday’s election was devastating, threatening deeply held articles of hope
and faith.
Thursday, November 10, 2016
Wednesday, November 9, 2016
What the Day Reveals
I don't think that everyone who voted for Trump is a racist, misogynist, or bigot. There are many factors that influenced voters, but still, Mr. Trump's campaign seems to have awakened a more public form of bigotry. People are saying publicly things they've kept to themselves before. It turns out that we - speaking of America - are not who I thought we were.
This turn of events has exposed a myth too often trusted by liberals and liberal Christians, a belief in progress. We've hoped that racism, sexism, and other bigotries would gradually fade in the face of progress. Simply discourage overt acts of racism, sexism, etc. and they will eventually die off on their own. We need merely wait them out. But progress, like all idols, fails to keep its promises. Progress can never end racism, can never bring the kingdom.
In the end, only God can set the world fully right, but in the interim, followers of Jesus are called to live in ways that bear witness to God's new day. Our waiting for God is an active waiting that shows others the hope and the shape of that day. From the time of Jesus this has meant living in ways that reflect God's rule and so are in conflict with the rule of Caesar, empire, and every power that oppresses or exploits or fails to seek the good of the least and most vulnerable. Our waiting requires a willingness to take up crosses, to give ourselves, and even to suffer, in order to embody the ways of Christ in a world that lives by different rules.
Today, on this day I did not expect, I find myself wondering what it means to embrace the way of Jesus at such a moment. I'm just beginning this process, but I offer these provisional thoughts in hopes that they will be helpful to some.
Reach out to those who are filled with fear, dread, terror, uncertainty, and more in the wake of this election. Jesus was most often to be found among those who were on the receiving end of power, and we should be, too.
If your image of America has been shattered, grief, lament, and even anger are appropriate. The Psalms are filled with anguished and angry lament, and many of us need to name and own the loss that we are feeling. At the same time, anger cannot turn to hate. I will not imagine that Donald Trump or any political party is somehow the embodiment of evil, anymore than I will imagine that my politics are the embodiment of good. I will pray those who are hurting, and I will pray as well for President-elect Trump and for all those who govern.
For people like myself and churches like the one I serve, do some deep soul searching. How often have we preferred being comfortable to living the gospel? How often have we been content to enjoy positions of racial and economic privilege? How often have our stances against hate, racism, sexism, homophobia, etc. been little more than opinions shared with the like minded, stances that cost us nothing, stances that trusted in progress or the passage of time and refused to go near a cross?
Finally, what does following Jesus look like at this moment? What steps does Jesus call us to take, what concrete actions does he require of us if we are to be his disciples in the world? How will we embody the hope of God's new day, a day ruled by love, in a moment when so many seem to be driven by fear?
I certainly have my own fears at the moment, but as a Christian, I also have hope that newness and life can arise out of loss and death. And so I will keep looking and listening for where and how Jesus is calling me and calling the church to live in ways that declares to the world the possibility and hope that God is indeed making all things new.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A prayer for today from Father Richard Rohr:
All vulnerable and merciful God,
We do not know what is ours to do.
We feel scared and alone today.
We are tired of taking sides.
We cannot hold any more fear or anger or rejection.
And yet we know so many of our friends feel unheard and unwanted.
Help us trust that no feeling is final,
And that YOU will have the full and final word.
If You are indeed a Suffering God, may we hold this suffering with You for those who voted for Hillary Clinton, for those who voted for President-elect Donald Trump, and for the many who have felt excluded by our politics in the many ways that we do indeed exclude.
We offer ourselves as best we can to hold this Love outward and open toward all, just as You never cease to do toward us.
We believe You are praying this prayer through us.
Amen
We do not know what is ours to do.
We feel scared and alone today.
We are tired of taking sides.
We cannot hold any more fear or anger or rejection.
And yet we know so many of our friends feel unheard and unwanted.
Help us trust that no feeling is final,
And that YOU will have the full and final word.
If You are indeed a Suffering God, may we hold this suffering with You for those who voted for Hillary Clinton, for those who voted for President-elect Donald Trump, and for the many who have felt excluded by our politics in the many ways that we do indeed exclude.
We offer ourselves as best we can to hold this Love outward and open toward all, just as You never cease to do toward us.
We believe You are praying this prayer through us.
Amen
Monday, November 7, 2016
The Kingdom and the Course of Human Events
Today and tomorrow will be anxiety filled for many people. As we await a final conclusion to the election campaign, will any new bombshells shake things up? Will our candidate, our party, prevail? Will we be rejoicing or cringing in horror when final outcomes are announced Tuesday night?
This particular campaign has occupied us in ways I don't recall previous ones doing, both captivating and horrifying us. Clearly there are important issues at stake. Still, I wonder if we don't sometimes overstate potential impacts. I wonder if we don't imagine the events that captivate and horrify us to have more earth shattering import than they truly do.
I have written previously of how I find it impossible to reconcile Christian faith with the stances taken by Donald Trump. I do think that those Christians who've made supporting Trump an article of their faith have done tremendous damage to the Christian "brand." But this does not mean that any sort of ultimate outcomes are riding on Tuesday's results. I think it unlikely that the apocalyptic scenarios imagined by some on the right or the left will materialize.
This is not to underestimate the human capacity to create genuinely terrible scenarios. Even a cursory study of history will reveal all manner of terrors that humans have wrought, but that doesn't mean that everything that scares us has such potential.
I will vote tomorrow and have my own worries about the consequences of the election results, as well as of the campaign itself. Yet as a Christian, I worry that we are overly fascinated with human capacity while nearly oblivious to that of the Divine. Surely there is some measure of myopia here.
In today's gospel reading, Jesus tells a parable that can be a little unnerving. Someone, clearly an important and powerful individual, sent out invitations to a fancy banquet, but when all was made ready, many of those invited has more pressing matters. Some of their excuses are pretty lame, but some sound legitimate. (I think my honeymoon would win out over anyone's party.) But the host makes no distinctions. People are herded in from the streets to fill the party, and the host vows that none of those originally invited will be allowed in.
This parable becomes especially problematic when we turn it into an allegory with the host playing the role of God, a God who is easily offended and remarkably unforgiving. But parables rarely work well as allegories, and this one isn't telling us anything about the character of God. Rather it is making a point about the all surpassing importance of the kingdom, of God's new day.
We humans tend to be caught up in our own events, some of them trivial and some of them important. But followers of Jesus must always have an eye on something bigger. Just how this "something bigger" intersects with our daily living can be an interesting and difficult negotiation, but if we do not have some sense of what God is up to, we will end up attaching ultimate importance to what we are.
Click to learn more about the lectionary.
This particular campaign has occupied us in ways I don't recall previous ones doing, both captivating and horrifying us. Clearly there are important issues at stake. Still, I wonder if we don't sometimes overstate potential impacts. I wonder if we don't imagine the events that captivate and horrify us to have more earth shattering import than they truly do.
I have written previously of how I find it impossible to reconcile Christian faith with the stances taken by Donald Trump. I do think that those Christians who've made supporting Trump an article of their faith have done tremendous damage to the Christian "brand." But this does not mean that any sort of ultimate outcomes are riding on Tuesday's results. I think it unlikely that the apocalyptic scenarios imagined by some on the right or the left will materialize.
This is not to underestimate the human capacity to create genuinely terrible scenarios. Even a cursory study of history will reveal all manner of terrors that humans have wrought, but that doesn't mean that everything that scares us has such potential.
I will vote tomorrow and have my own worries about the consequences of the election results, as well as of the campaign itself. Yet as a Christian, I worry that we are overly fascinated with human capacity while nearly oblivious to that of the Divine. Surely there is some measure of myopia here.
In today's gospel reading, Jesus tells a parable that can be a little unnerving. Someone, clearly an important and powerful individual, sent out invitations to a fancy banquet, but when all was made ready, many of those invited has more pressing matters. Some of their excuses are pretty lame, but some sound legitimate. (I think my honeymoon would win out over anyone's party.) But the host makes no distinctions. People are herded in from the streets to fill the party, and the host vows that none of those originally invited will be allowed in.
This parable becomes especially problematic when we turn it into an allegory with the host playing the role of God, a God who is easily offended and remarkably unforgiving. But parables rarely work well as allegories, and this one isn't telling us anything about the character of God. Rather it is making a point about the all surpassing importance of the kingdom, of God's new day.
We humans tend to be caught up in our own events, some of them trivial and some of them important. But followers of Jesus must always have an eye on something bigger. Just how this "something bigger" intersects with our daily living can be an interesting and difficult negotiation, but if we do not have some sense of what God is up to, we will end up attaching ultimate importance to what we are.
Click to learn more about the lectionary.
Sunday, November 6, 2016
Sermon: Trick Questions
Luke 20:27-38
Trick Questions
James Sledge November
6, 2016
When
I was 13, my brother and I discovered the comedian, George Carlin. We laughed
at his seven words you couldn't say on television, when our parents weren’t
around to hear. But I was also intrigued by his take on growing up Catholic. I
knew nothing about Catholics or Catholic schools, but Carlin's stories about
questioning and challenging the teachings of the church resonated with my own,
early teenage questions and doubts.
Carlin
told of creating elaborate scenarios to trip up the priests and make them look
foolish. One story involved the requirement that Catholics receive communion at
least once between Ash Wednesday and Pentecost.
Not doing your “Easter duty” was a mortal sin.
“Father,
suppose that you didn’t make your Easter duty, and it’s Pentecost Sunday, the
last day. And you’re on a ship at sea, and the chaplain goes into a coma. But
you wanted to receive. And then it’s Monday, too late. But then you cross the
International Date Line.” No doubt the priests loved it when little George Carlin
raised his hand in class.
The
Sadducees in today’s gospel engage in something similar, though the stakes are
a lot higher. They devise an elaborate scenario to trip up Jesus and make him
look foolish, but this isn't a game. They see Jesus as a threat, and they
desperately want to discredit him.
The
Sadducees were a small, wealthy, conservative faction of Judaism. To them only Torah
the Books of Moses – the first five books of our Bible – were scripture, and
they found no evidence for resurrection there. By contrast, the Pharisees and
Jesus considered most of what we call the Old Testament scripture, and they found
support for resurrection in the prophets and other writings. However, this
resurrection wasn’t about going to heaven. It was a hope for a new age when all
would be made new, and the dead raised.
These
Sadducees have watched as Jesus evades the traps set for him by other
opponents, but now they take their turn. No doubt they are a little surprised
that this country rabbi, an uneducated rube from the backwoods of Nazareth, has
successfully matched wits with religious experts. But they have Moses on their
side. They have Torah. I imagine that they are snickering a bit as they lay out
a George Carlin like scenario.
Tuesday, October 25, 2016
Sunday, October 23, 2016
Sermon: Falling into God's Love
Luke 18:9-14
Falling into God’s Love
James Sledge October
23, 2016
Many
years ago, I preached a sermon from today’s gospel reading where a couple of
members helped me do a dramatic reading of the parable with just a little
updating. The Pharisee became an upstanding church member and the tax collector
was a drug dealer. The first change is obvious. Pharisees were the upstanding
Protestants of their day. The second change perhaps needs more explanation.
Tax
collectors in Jesus’ time were not civil service employees. They were part of a
bizarre, corrupt system that permitted tax collectors to pry as much money as
they could from those in their community. The Romans did not care how much they
collected as long as Rome got the prescribed amount. Tax collectors could keep
everything else for themselves. Tax collectors often used intimidation and
threats to get as much as they could, often preying on the most vulnerable in
society. And they became wealthy while helping out an occupying, foreign power.
They made modern slum lords look charitable by comparison, and they were
rightly despised.
And
so in church that Sunday years ago, an upstanding church member thanked God that
he was not like robbers and thieves and other sorts of low life. He certainly
wasn’t anything like a drug dealer. He tithed and then some to his church. He
served on committees and session and never missed a worship service if he was
in town.
The
drug dealer didn’t dare come up to the front of the church. He stayed off to
the side and never looked up. He pulled at his clothes and hair as he said,
“God, be merciful to me, a sinner.” And you’ve already heard the parable so you
know what Jesus said next.
A
few days later, I got a letter (email was still fairly new) from a church
members not at all happy with my sermon. Who would keep the church running, or
pay my salary, he asked, if not upstanding church members like the one I had
substituted for the Pharisee? It certainly wasn’t going to be drug dealers or
others of that ilk.
Monday, October 17, 2016
But I Don't Wanna Descend
We modern
people use the Bible very differently than did early Christians. For starters,
they didn't have a Bible other than what we call the Old Testament. And what
would later become the New Testament was not meant to tell the story of Jesus.
The letters and the gospels were written for Christians who already knew Jesus'
story. They were written to help people understand those stories better, and
often they were written to address concerns in a particular congregation.
That means that when people first read the section from Luke that is today's gospel, they knew very well what it meant that Jesus "set his face to go to Jerusalem." They knew exactly what awaited Jesus there. The author of the gospel is reminding them that all the events reported in the coming pages happen against the backdrop of Jesus purposely moving toward Jerusalem and the cross.
I take it from Luke's gospel, the letters of Paul, and much else in the New Testament, that those early Christians struggled as much with the cross as I do. That's especially true in light of Jesus calling us to embrace the way of the cross, even to take up our own.
In today's verses, we learn than a Samaritan village doesn't receive Jesus "because his face was set toward Jerusalem." I'm not 100 percent sure what this means, but I assume that Jesus' focus on Jerusalem and the cross makes them think Jesus won't be doing any neat tricks for them.
I know how they feel. I want Jesus to do stuff for me, and when he's all fixated on the cross, I don't really want to be around him. I don't much care for talk of needing to deny myself, lose myself, take up my cross, and so on.
That means that when people first read the section from Luke that is today's gospel, they knew very well what it meant that Jesus "set his face to go to Jerusalem." They knew exactly what awaited Jesus there. The author of the gospel is reminding them that all the events reported in the coming pages happen against the backdrop of Jesus purposely moving toward Jerusalem and the cross.
I take it from Luke's gospel, the letters of Paul, and much else in the New Testament, that those early Christians struggled as much with the cross as I do. That's especially true in light of Jesus calling us to embrace the way of the cross, even to take up our own.
In today's verses, we learn than a Samaritan village doesn't receive Jesus "because his face was set toward Jerusalem." I'm not 100 percent sure what this means, but I assume that Jesus' focus on Jerusalem and the cross makes them think Jesus won't be doing any neat tricks for them.
I know how they feel. I want Jesus to do stuff for me, and when he's all fixated on the cross, I don't really want to be around him. I don't much care for talk of needing to deny myself, lose myself, take up my cross, and so on.
In his
meditation for today, Richard Rohr speaks of "the path of descent,"
of how we are transformed only through the act of dying and rising. He writes,
"As a culture, we have to be taught the language of descent because we are
by training capitalists and accumulators. Mature religion shows us how to enter
willingly and trustingly into the dark periods of life. These dark periods are
good teachers."
But I keep
asking Jesus to make things better for me. And I think that Jesus has abandoned
me when things are bad for very long. I guess when it comes to "the
language of descent," I'm a pretty slow learner.
Sunday, October 16, 2016
Sermon: Imagining Faith
Luke 18:1-8
Imagining Faith
James Sledge October
9, 2016
What
is Christian faith? How do you know if you have it? These would seem to be
central and crucial questions for Christianity, church, or whatever label you
use to describe those who say they follow Jesus. Yet I’m not sure we how much
agreement there is on the answers.
For
some, faith is mostly about belief, belief about who Jesus is and what he
accomplished, belief in the truth of his teachings, belief in the veracity of
the Bible, and so on. For others faith seems to be about knowledge or
information. People say, “I can’t share my faith with others because I don’t
know it well enough.”
Some
people think of faith as hope or trust
that God is somehow guiding things toward a good outcome. This hope may be
vague or specific. It may be focused mostly on personal benefits such as wealth
or health or getting into heaven. Or it may be focused on the flow of history,
on the “arc of the moral universe.”
For
some people faith includes specific forms of piety and practice. For others, it’s
simply the notion that there is a God, some higher power. And there are other
possibilities.
In
the reading from Luke that we heard last Sunday, Jesus makes a connection
between faith and gratitude to God. And in our reading this morning, Jesus
again connects faith to concrete behaviors on the part of his followers.
Jesus
tells a brief parable with two characters, a widow and an unjust judge. If
Jesus were telling the parable in our day, the characters might be different.
But in Jesus’ day of male dominated patriarchy, widows were among the most
vulnerable. As females, they did not have full legal status, and without a
husband or adult son, it was difficult for them to hold onto property or
possessions. They could easily end up on the streets, reduced to begging.
Presumably this widow’s opponent has taken advantage of this situation.
We
may be unfamiliar with the precarious position of widows in Jesus’ day, but we
know all about unjust judges or other office holders who utilize their position
for personal gain, with no regard for basic morality or God’s concern for the
weak and vulnerable. We know all about a world where innocents suffer, where raw
power preempts justice.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)