Sermons and thoughts on faith on Scripture from my time at Old Presbyterian Meeting House and Falls Church Presbyterian Church, plus sermons and postings from "Pastor James," my blog while pastor at Boulevard Presbyterian in Columbus, OH.
Saturday, December 24, 2016
Tuesday, December 20, 2016
Hard To Be Christian At Christmas
When I looked at the daily lectionary passages for today, once again there wasn't much connection to Christmas. Elizabeth's pregnancy with the child who will grow up to be John the Baptist is announced to his father, Zechariah, so we are getting closer. But I suspect that a lot of casual observers of Christmas would not connect this story to the birth of Jesus.
Because the daily lectionary has readings daily, duh, it cannot bring out Christmas passages until we're almost there. People not well acquainted with the Bible might expect, based on the amount of attention paid to Christmas, that it is a major deal in our sacred texts. But there's just not very much Christmas in the Bible. None at all in the gospels of John and Mark, and only Luke has anything about a baby in a manger, visited by shepherds.
It is a beautiful story, though, and I'm not at all bothered by how much people like it and enjoy hearing it repeated this time of year. For that matter, I'm well and good with many traditions connected to Christmas; decorating trees, giving gifts, stringing lights, gathering with family, Christmas movies, and even Santa Claus. Most have little connection to Jesus' birth or to Christian faith, but neither do any number of other things that I appreciate and enjoy.
Still, I often find faith more difficult at Christmas than at any other time of the year. That may sound odd considering more people show up at church over the next week than any other time of year. At times, Christmas even draws people back to the Church, for which I'm thankful. But my own faith might be better served by going to sleep around Thanksgiving and waking up mid-January.
If I were to point to a single culprit for this situation, it would be the "War on Christmas," or more correctly, the soldiers who would defend Christmas in this imagined war. Every time I hear someone take offense at "Happy Holidays," or boldly proclaim their use of "Merry Christmas" as though they were a Christian martyr confessing the faith before a Roman tribunal, I want to give up the label "Christian" until the season is well past.
The whole squabble about "Merry Christmas" trivializes faith, making it more about easy statements and comfortable nameplates than about anything Jesus commanded us to do. And in the worst instances, the "Merry Christmas" enforcers act in ways antithetical to Jesus' teachings, treating neighbor in a manner they would never wish for themselves over mostly imagined slights. If this is Christianity, why would anyone want to join such a mean-spirited little clique.
But I shouldn't be too hard on the defenders of "Merry Christmas." In many ways they are carrying on the Church's own work of trivializing the faith, making it mostly a matter of belief statements attendance at worship services. Neither of these require much in the way of following Jesus or obeying his commandments. Perhaps that's why the silliness around the War on Christmas gets me so down. It brings into sharp focus the ways in which the Church itself has undermined authentic Christian discipleship.
The Church's fascination with Christmas may well be a part of this. Aside from the beauty of the Christmas story and the good news of a Savior born for us, there is also the added advantage of a Messiah who cannot yet talk. The babe in the manger will not tell us to love our enemies. He most will certainly not say, "Woe to you who are rich," words spoken by the man Jesus. The babe in a manger is a perfectly safe object of worship and devotion, one who will not ask anything of us.
Regardless, Jesus' birth calls for celebration, and I hope you enjoy the Christmas season with its warmth and joy, its beautiful music and splendor, its promise that God is indeed for us. But I hope you'll forgive me for wanting it to hurry up and be over, for looking forward to the time when there's a slightly better chance we may encounter the Jesus who says to us, "Let go of the things you thought were so important, and come, follow me."
Click to learn more about the lectionary.
Because the daily lectionary has readings daily, duh, it cannot bring out Christmas passages until we're almost there. People not well acquainted with the Bible might expect, based on the amount of attention paid to Christmas, that it is a major deal in our sacred texts. But there's just not very much Christmas in the Bible. None at all in the gospels of John and Mark, and only Luke has anything about a baby in a manger, visited by shepherds.
It is a beautiful story, though, and I'm not at all bothered by how much people like it and enjoy hearing it repeated this time of year. For that matter, I'm well and good with many traditions connected to Christmas; decorating trees, giving gifts, stringing lights, gathering with family, Christmas movies, and even Santa Claus. Most have little connection to Jesus' birth or to Christian faith, but neither do any number of other things that I appreciate and enjoy.
Still, I often find faith more difficult at Christmas than at any other time of the year. That may sound odd considering more people show up at church over the next week than any other time of year. At times, Christmas even draws people back to the Church, for which I'm thankful. But my own faith might be better served by going to sleep around Thanksgiving and waking up mid-January.
If I were to point to a single culprit for this situation, it would be the "War on Christmas," or more correctly, the soldiers who would defend Christmas in this imagined war. Every time I hear someone take offense at "Happy Holidays," or boldly proclaim their use of "Merry Christmas" as though they were a Christian martyr confessing the faith before a Roman tribunal, I want to give up the label "Christian" until the season is well past.
The whole squabble about "Merry Christmas" trivializes faith, making it more about easy statements and comfortable nameplates than about anything Jesus commanded us to do. And in the worst instances, the "Merry Christmas" enforcers act in ways antithetical to Jesus' teachings, treating neighbor in a manner they would never wish for themselves over mostly imagined slights. If this is Christianity, why would anyone want to join such a mean-spirited little clique.
But I shouldn't be too hard on the defenders of "Merry Christmas." In many ways they are carrying on the Church's own work of trivializing the faith, making it mostly a matter of belief statements attendance at worship services. Neither of these require much in the way of following Jesus or obeying his commandments. Perhaps that's why the silliness around the War on Christmas gets me so down. It brings into sharp focus the ways in which the Church itself has undermined authentic Christian discipleship.
The Church's fascination with Christmas may well be a part of this. Aside from the beauty of the Christmas story and the good news of a Savior born for us, there is also the added advantage of a Messiah who cannot yet talk. The babe in the manger will not tell us to love our enemies. He most will certainly not say, "Woe to you who are rich," words spoken by the man Jesus. The babe in a manger is a perfectly safe object of worship and devotion, one who will not ask anything of us.
Regardless, Jesus' birth calls for celebration, and I hope you enjoy the Christmas season with its warmth and joy, its beautiful music and splendor, its promise that God is indeed for us. But I hope you'll forgive me for wanting it to hurry up and be over, for looking forward to the time when there's a slightly better chance we may encounter the Jesus who says to us, "Let go of the things you thought were so important, and come, follow me."
Click to learn more about the lectionary.
Sunday, December 18, 2016
Sermon: Christmas Identities
Matthew 1:18-25
Christmas Identities
James Sledge December
18, 2016
It’s
getting close enough to Christmas that the gospel reading for today actually speaks
of Christmas. It’s not what most of us think of as the Christmas story,
but it’s all that Matthew’s gospel has. (Matthew also tells of the visit from
the Magi, but Jesus may have been two or so when that happened.)
Nearly
a hundred years ago, today’s gospel, along with the annunciation to Mary in Luke,
provided ammunition in something known as the fundamentalist controversy. To be
ordained in the Presbyterian Church back then required belief in a set of
fundamentals, one of them being the virgin birth. This was part of a larger fight
about the truth of the Bible. In this case it led to a rather ridiculous
argument about whether or not the gospels got the science and biology of Jesus right.
Never mind that the gospel writers had no notion of such things.
We’re
still living with residue of those fights. There is a Christianity that insists
on a literal reading of the Bible with cut and dried meanings to the text. It’s
a view that’s not very tolerant of questions and tends toward a “believe it or
else” mentality.
Then there’s a Christianity not at all
bothered by whether or not Mary is a virgin. It’s perfectly content to accept
scientific notions of evolution, the Big Bang, and so on. But this Christianity
sometimes struggles with just what role Scripture plays in the life of faith. Often
Scripture is “true” only if it doesn’t contradict science or my sense of what
is possible, and so it cannot really tell me much of consequence that I don’t already
know from other sources.
________________________________________________________________________________
Recently
a church member dropped by the office with a concern. He wasn’t upset with me
or with anyone else. Rather he had a nagging worry that the church had lost its
way in some sense. Not just this church, but others like it. It seemed to him
that our sort of congregation is often a nice group of like-minded individuals,
many who do a great deal to make the world a better place. But he wasn’t sure
there was much distinctly Christian about it.
As
we discussed his concerns, it seemed to me that he was speaking of an issue
that has troubled me for some time, one of identity, specifically Christian
identity.
Monday, December 12, 2016
Hung Juries and Christmas Hope
Several times in the last week, I've found myself wide awake in the middle of the night, struggling to make sense of a hung jury in the trial of the former police office who shot an unarmed Walter Scott. There is video showing Scott being shot in the back as he runs away. If that is not enough to convict, what is?
If you did not pay attention to the trial, one key moment was when the former police officer took the stand and explained how Scott's actions left him so fearful he had no choice but to shoot. And some jurors accepted that argument.
Fear of black men has deep roots in American culture, especially in the South. In colonial SC, fear of slave revolts was not without good reason. When you oppress someone, they may well try to undo that oppression. They may even simply want to make you pay for it.
When slavery finally ended, oppression did not. Former slaves and their descendants were "kept in their place" by all manner of laws and customs, and so fear was still warranted. To make matters worse, all this was wedded to the Christianity practiced by whites, particularly white southerners.
This fear of blacks did not simply go away as legal discrimination came to an end. I was an eighth grader in Charlotte, NC when the courts ordered a bussing plan to end segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. Many white students left for privates schools, an option I never heard discussed in my home. That may have been because my parents were fairly progressive on racial issues. It may also have been because my family didn't have the means to put four children in private school.
Regardless, I clearly recall events early in the start of my ninth grade year when the school lines had again been redrawn to comply with the court, necessitating my attending a third junior high school in as many years. That this school was a formerly black school in a black neighborhood did not seem to bother my parents. My mother had volunteered in the Head Start program at the next door elementary school, after all. But then something happened that was too much for my mother.
The bus that picked me and my brother up as the new school year began was nearly full when it came by my home out in the sparsely populated "country." And almost every other child on the bus was black. It made me nervous, and it must have terrified my mother. She got onto the bus and had words with the driver. She and a few other white parents were soon on the phone to school officials and soon the bus route was changed. There were still black students on my bus, but they formed a more appropriate minority, allaying my and my mother's fears.
I don't know, but I suspect the police officer who shot Walter Scott was shaped by the same fears I learned as a child. No doubt some of the jurors at his trial were as well. It we would be nice to think that the fear I experienced in junior high was a thing of the past, but events keep reminding us that is not so.
As I think about all this, I am troubled by how seldom I have heard the church I grew up in address fear and race and privilege. The churches of my youth, much like my parents, were not racist in any overt way. Some reached out to develop relationships with black congregations. Still, I don't recall ever hearing a sermon addressing the evils of racism, much less one taking on the white privilege that so advantaged me and my fellow congregants. I can't recall a critique of a culture that defined itself by white standards, a culture that was unnerved by too much blackness in much the same way I was unnerved as a 14 year old getting on a school bus.
And now, as we move deeper into Advent and closer to Christmas, many would like to forget about the bitterness of the recent election. Many would like to focus on joy and peace and goodwill. But if we are listening at all to the prophets who herald a Messiah, we realize that their promises are connected to scathing critique of oppressive systems in their day. If we pay attention to the stories connected to Jesus' birth, we will see the powerful lashing out in fear and killing the innocent.
If there is real and meaningful hope to be found at Christmas, it is not located in the warmth of nostalgia or gathered families, as wonderful as those things may be. It is to be found in the assurance that God enters into human history on the side of the poor and the weak and the oppressed. And even if the Church too often forgets that, too often aligns itself with the powerful and with fear, God does not. Not if the Christmas story is true. God, I hope it is true.
If you did not pay attention to the trial, one key moment was when the former police officer took the stand and explained how Scott's actions left him so fearful he had no choice but to shoot. And some jurors accepted that argument.
Fear of black men has deep roots in American culture, especially in the South. In colonial SC, fear of slave revolts was not without good reason. When you oppress someone, they may well try to undo that oppression. They may even simply want to make you pay for it.
When slavery finally ended, oppression did not. Former slaves and their descendants were "kept in their place" by all manner of laws and customs, and so fear was still warranted. To make matters worse, all this was wedded to the Christianity practiced by whites, particularly white southerners.
This fear of blacks did not simply go away as legal discrimination came to an end. I was an eighth grader in Charlotte, NC when the courts ordered a bussing plan to end segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. Many white students left for privates schools, an option I never heard discussed in my home. That may have been because my parents were fairly progressive on racial issues. It may also have been because my family didn't have the means to put four children in private school.
Regardless, I clearly recall events early in the start of my ninth grade year when the school lines had again been redrawn to comply with the court, necessitating my attending a third junior high school in as many years. That this school was a formerly black school in a black neighborhood did not seem to bother my parents. My mother had volunteered in the Head Start program at the next door elementary school, after all. But then something happened that was too much for my mother.
The bus that picked me and my brother up as the new school year began was nearly full when it came by my home out in the sparsely populated "country." And almost every other child on the bus was black. It made me nervous, and it must have terrified my mother. She got onto the bus and had words with the driver. She and a few other white parents were soon on the phone to school officials and soon the bus route was changed. There were still black students on my bus, but they formed a more appropriate minority, allaying my and my mother's fears.
I don't know, but I suspect the police officer who shot Walter Scott was shaped by the same fears I learned as a child. No doubt some of the jurors at his trial were as well. It we would be nice to think that the fear I experienced in junior high was a thing of the past, but events keep reminding us that is not so.
As I think about all this, I am troubled by how seldom I have heard the church I grew up in address fear and race and privilege. The churches of my youth, much like my parents, were not racist in any overt way. Some reached out to develop relationships with black congregations. Still, I don't recall ever hearing a sermon addressing the evils of racism, much less one taking on the white privilege that so advantaged me and my fellow congregants. I can't recall a critique of a culture that defined itself by white standards, a culture that was unnerved by too much blackness in much the same way I was unnerved as a 14 year old getting on a school bus.
And now, as we move deeper into Advent and closer to Christmas, many would like to forget about the bitterness of the recent election. Many would like to focus on joy and peace and goodwill. But if we are listening at all to the prophets who herald a Messiah, we realize that their promises are connected to scathing critique of oppressive systems in their day. If we pay attention to the stories connected to Jesus' birth, we will see the powerful lashing out in fear and killing the innocent.
If there is real and meaningful hope to be found at Christmas, it is not located in the warmth of nostalgia or gathered families, as wonderful as those things may be. It is to be found in the assurance that God enters into human history on the side of the poor and the weak and the oppressed. And even if the Church too often forgets that, too often aligns itself with the powerful and with fear, God does not. Not if the Christmas story is true. God, I hope it is true.
Sunday, December 11, 2016
Sermon: Is Jesus the One?
Matthew 11:2-6
Is Jesus the One?
James Sledge December
11, 016
“Are you the one who is to come, or are we to wait
for another?”
asks John the Baptist from his prison cell. This is same John who did not want
to baptize Jesus, who said, “I need to be baptized by you.” Perhaps
John had expected more of Jesus, more vivid signs that God’s reign was indeed
arriving. After all, John had announced the kingdom was coming. He had told
people to repent, to change and get ready for it. But now he was in prison,
soon to be executed, and the world didn’t look very different. Maybe he’d been
wrong about Jesus.
Is
Jesus the one? I think a lot of people still ask that question. Maybe not out
loud, but it’s there, unspoken. In less than two weeks, our sanctuary, like
many other sanctuaries, will fill to overflowing with people celebrating
Christmas. I suspect that most will want the message of Emmanuel and Peace on
earth to be true. They hope it might be and come on Christmas Eve, hoping to
glimpse signs of it.
But
soon enough, they will look around, see that the world still looks unchanged. Like
John the Baptist, they’ll have trouble holding onto the hope of Christmas and believing
that Jesus really is the one. Hope may stir once again next Christmas, but it
is hard to maintain during most of the year.
When
John’s question is brought to Jesus, he says to go and tell John, “The
blind receive their sight, the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, the deaf
hear, the dead are raised, and the poor have good news brought to them.” This is the proof Jesus offers John.
It’s
a curious list Jesus provides. It includes some pretty impressive miracles and
healings, but such things were not unknown from Israel’s past. Old Testament
prophets Elijah and Elisha healed the sick and even raised the dead with no
expectation that they were about to bring God’s reign. So why would Jesus’ miracles
be proof that God’s new day was close?
I
wonder if Jesus’ point isn’t more about the last item in the list, “the
poor have good news brought to them.” Come to think of it, most of the
people on the list were poor. There was no social safety net in those days, and
the lame, blind, and deaf mostly survived by begging. For Jesus to end his list
with the promise of good news for the poor suggests that he’s not just making a
point about his ability to do miracles. He’s saying that he is the fulfilment
of prophetic hopes that God would one day lift up the poor, put an end to
oppression and exploitation, raise up those at the bottom, and pull down those
at the top.
Is Jesus the one? The Church says he is,
and so we might expect that the Church would be largely focused on good news
for the poor. But somewhere along the way, the Church’s message became more
about personal salvation.
Saturday, December 10, 2016
Sunday, December 4, 2016
Sermon: When God Stirs
Matthew 3:1-12
When God Stirs
James Sledge December
4, 2016
I
wonder if I would have gone out to see John the Baptist, or would I have missed
him entirely? It’s not like you could bump into him by accident. He wasn’t any
place I ever lived, not the city, the suburbs, or even out in the rural countryside.
He was in the wilderness.
When
I hear wilderness I sometimes think
of pristine forests. In American thought, wilderness
often describes lands untouched by human hands. The US has designated
wilderness areas, set aside to protect them from human encroachment. But the wilderness in our gospel reading is a
different sort.
The
word “wild” forms the basis for our word “wilderness,” but not so the word in
our gospel. It speaks of deserted, desolate places. It describes deserts and
the barren wilderness where Israel and
Moses wandered for forty years, surviving only because God provided manna for food.
John
the Baptist is not some back to nature guy, living in a remote area where we
might want to go hiking. He is grizzled prophet, living on the margins of
society, where life is precarious,. Why would anyone go out there to see him?
Israel
had an interesting relationship with wilderness.
It was a hostile, inhospitable and dangerous place, yet it was also the place
where God had given the Law and had been with Israel most concretely. And so
when Israel was worried or hoped for God to intervene, they sometimes turned
toward the wilderness, where their
ancestors had once experienced God more directly than seemed possible for them.
I
don’t know that we Americans have anything comparable, anyplace where we turn
our gaze, longing for some sign that God may be stirring. This time of year we do
turn our gaze toward Christmas, but I’m not sure it’s because we hope for signs
of God about to do something. If anything, Christmas becomes a balm, a
distraction, a respite, one we don’t expect to last much beyond the new year.
John
the Baptist is something of an intrusion into our Christmas preparations. He
breaks into the warmth and nostalgia to insists that God is stirring, and that
we must change if we are to be part of it. Sure, John. Whatever.
I
doubt I would have gone to see John. We may live in worrisome, difficult times,
but I’m not much expecting God to intervene. I’m even less inclined to think I
need to repent, to change because of my part in how things are. No, I probably
would have stayed in Jerusalem.
Tuesday, November 29, 2016
Monday, November 28, 2016
But What Does God Think?
Some of my more evangelical Facebook friends regularly post calls to praise God. A few of them engage in those manipulative posts declaring, "If you love Jesus you will share this." Psalms of praise are often cited, and the need for us to worship God and to pray is highlighted.
Some of these same people regularly share posts that attack Muslims as vile and evil, or that imply people on food stamps are addicts and social leeches. And so when I read today's passage from Isaiah, I couldn't help wanting to fling it at them. "When you come before me, who asked this from your hand? Trample my courts no more; bringing offerings is futile... I cannot endure solemn assemblies with iniquity. Your new moons and your appointed festivals my soul hates." See, God has no use for your worship when you don't care about the oppressed and the poor and weak.
But just when I'm feeling a little smug, I remember what I do for a living. I'm a pastor, and many of the members at my church see my primarily in worship. They evaluate me primarily by how well I preach and lead worship. Ultimately, I have to attract people to our worship services for me to be "successful" as a pastor, and I keep a wary eye on the weekly worship attendance figures.
My uneasiness is only amplified by the fact that we've entered Advent. I can get away with some non-Christmasy sermons for the first two Sundays, including some more somber sounding Advent hymns. But as the big day draws near, the carols will show up, along with familiar choir pieces and Bible verses that people love. It will culminate in some of the largest worship crowds of the year on Christmas Eve. It will be beautiful and moving with candles and carols and the story of Jesus' birth. Hopefully, God will be pleased.
I'm not suggesting that God will take any offense, but I do wonder about Isaiah and other prophets' critiques of worship that is divorced from social justice. I wonder about faith that doesn't somehow reshape and re-form us so that our concerns and priorities begin to mirror those of Jesus.
Modern American Christianity has some impossible expectations of worship. It is supposed to inspire, entertain, feed, comfort, uplift, and more. Church leaders spend a great deal of time trying to manage these expectations and provide worship that is both theologically appropriate but still sensitive to what people need and/or expect. But how often do we ask ourselves what God thinks of our worship? More to the point, how often do we ask ourselves what God thinks of us as worshippers?
Click to learn more about the lectionary.
Some of these same people regularly share posts that attack Muslims as vile and evil, or that imply people on food stamps are addicts and social leeches. And so when I read today's passage from Isaiah, I couldn't help wanting to fling it at them. "When you come before me, who asked this from your hand? Trample my courts no more; bringing offerings is futile... I cannot endure solemn assemblies with iniquity. Your new moons and your appointed festivals my soul hates." See, God has no use for your worship when you don't care about the oppressed and the poor and weak.
But just when I'm feeling a little smug, I remember what I do for a living. I'm a pastor, and many of the members at my church see my primarily in worship. They evaluate me primarily by how well I preach and lead worship. Ultimately, I have to attract people to our worship services for me to be "successful" as a pastor, and I keep a wary eye on the weekly worship attendance figures.
My uneasiness is only amplified by the fact that we've entered Advent. I can get away with some non-Christmasy sermons for the first two Sundays, including some more somber sounding Advent hymns. But as the big day draws near, the carols will show up, along with familiar choir pieces and Bible verses that people love. It will culminate in some of the largest worship crowds of the year on Christmas Eve. It will be beautiful and moving with candles and carols and the story of Jesus' birth. Hopefully, God will be pleased.
I'm not suggesting that God will take any offense, but I do wonder about Isaiah and other prophets' critiques of worship that is divorced from social justice. I wonder about faith that doesn't somehow reshape and re-form us so that our concerns and priorities begin to mirror those of Jesus.
Modern American Christianity has some impossible expectations of worship. It is supposed to inspire, entertain, feed, comfort, uplift, and more. Church leaders spend a great deal of time trying to manage these expectations and provide worship that is both theologically appropriate but still sensitive to what people need and/or expect. But how often do we ask ourselves what God thinks of our worship? More to the point, how often do we ask ourselves what God thinks of us as worshippers?
Click to learn more about the lectionary.
Sunday, November 27, 2016
Sermon: Walking in the Light
Isaiah 2:1-5
Walking in the Light
James Sledge November
27, 2016
Well,
we have arrived. On the secular calendar, at least, we are officially in the
Christmas season. The Thanksgiving parades have passed by with Santa at the
tail end, and no one can complain that it’s too early for Christmas or
decorations at the mall.
When
I was growing up, this was the time when genuine excitement about Christmas would
kick in, when my brother and I would start to dream about what gifts would make
for a perfect Christmas morning. We were raised in the church and attended
Sunday School most every week, so we knew all about the “real” Christmas story
with Mary and Joseph and a manger. It was a warm and beautiful story, very much
a part of our family’s Christmas traditions, but that story had almost nothing
to do with the excitement I felt as Christmas neared. If Christmas was going to
change my life, make it better or happier in some way, it wasn’t going to be
because of Jesus. It was going to be because of Santa, or at least some of his
“helpers.”
I’m
reasonably sure that my experience was not that unusual. Jesus may be “the
reason for the season,” but most of our hopes at Christmas are not really about
Jesus or Christian faith. We’re not much expecting all that much from Jesus or
faith in this season. If Christmas is going to provide any magic, it will
likely be through some moments of goodwill, the warmth of nostalgia, families
gathered together, and the joy of children.
These
last two help explain why not many will be here if you come to worship on
Christmas, one of those dreaded years when it falls on a Sunday. Many, and I
don’t exclude myself, would just as soon spend the morning at home with loved
ones, enjoying the delight of children opening their gifts, or simply
remembering such delight as we open our own.
Now
if you’re worried that I’m about to get on a rant about how we’ve lost the real
meaning of Christmas or how we need to de-commercialize it, you needn’t. I’m
all for simplifying and toning down the conspicuous consumerism. But I think
that we invest so much into the Christmas season because it speaks to some deep
longings that we have, longings for goodwill among people, for families and communities
to be united, for us to know once more the joy and hopefulness and even naiveté
of children.
Such
longings are hardly exclusive to Christians which is one of the reasons that
Christmas appeals to many outside the Church. For a moment, the world can feel
a little kinder, a little more joyful, a little more hopeful. For a few weeks,
we can get caught up in something and at least imagine a slightly better world.
Perhaps that’s the best we can hope for.
Swords into plowshares and spears into pruning hooks sounds wonderful, but
what are the chances? The prophet spoke these words close to 3000 years ago,
and since then we’ve just gotten better and better at war and killing. Maybe we
should be happy for a little Christmas cheer and goodwill and leave it at that.
Monday, November 21, 2016
Surely Jesus Didn't Mean That
Surely Jesus didn't really mean that. Or surely he didn't mean it to have any sort of general application. You've likely heard such responses to Jesus words from today's gospel reading where he says, "Sell all that you own and distribute the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me." There must have been some particular problem with money and possessions for this one fellow whom Jesus addresses. Except Jesus also adds, "How hard it is for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God!"
Most of us think of wealth as a blessing. At Thanksgiving we will offer thanks for our nice homes and overflowing dinner tables. But Jesus speaks of wealth as a curse. Surely he didn't mean that.
Over the centuries, we Christians have become skilled at figuring out reasons why Jesus didn't really mean what he said. We feel little compulsion to love our enemies; we don't even want to love our neighbors, certainly not as much as we love ourselves. We're reasonably sure that we can serve God and the acquisition of wealth. Never mind what Jesus says. And we have absolutely no use for the crosses Jesus insists we pick up and carry.
Especially for Protestants, we got so focused on faith, often understood as little more than "believing in Jesus," that we nearly forgot about being disciples. We domesticated Jesus to the point that we can believe in him while ignoring most of what he says. This despite his Great Commission that speaks of making disciples by teaching people "to obey everything I that have commanded you."
One of the ways we domesticate Jesus is by insisting that faith should not be "political." But the basic claims of Christian faith are blatantly political. They do not belong to any particular political party or ideology, but they demand a loyalty to the ways of Jesus over and against the ways of earthly powers. If Jesus is king then Caesar is not. If Jesus is my Lord, then all earthly powers and allegiances lose any ultimate claims to my loyalty and service.
If Jesus has special concern for the poor and marginalized combined with deep misgivings about the wealthy and powerful, then I must share his point of view. And this will demand that I speak out against the wealthy and powerful who do not work for the good of the "least of these," who do not seek justice and mercy for all people. If Jesus is my Lord, I must join him, and the tradition of the prophets in which he stands, to speak truth to power.
Or I could just believe in Jesus and ignore pretty much everyone he says. It turns out that is a lot easier.
Click to learn more about the lectionary.
Most of us think of wealth as a blessing. At Thanksgiving we will offer thanks for our nice homes and overflowing dinner tables. But Jesus speaks of wealth as a curse. Surely he didn't mean that.
Over the centuries, we Christians have become skilled at figuring out reasons why Jesus didn't really mean what he said. We feel little compulsion to love our enemies; we don't even want to love our neighbors, certainly not as much as we love ourselves. We're reasonably sure that we can serve God and the acquisition of wealth. Never mind what Jesus says. And we have absolutely no use for the crosses Jesus insists we pick up and carry.
Especially for Protestants, we got so focused on faith, often understood as little more than "believing in Jesus," that we nearly forgot about being disciples. We domesticated Jesus to the point that we can believe in him while ignoring most of what he says. This despite his Great Commission that speaks of making disciples by teaching people "to obey everything I that have commanded you."
One of the ways we domesticate Jesus is by insisting that faith should not be "political." But the basic claims of Christian faith are blatantly political. They do not belong to any particular political party or ideology, but they demand a loyalty to the ways of Jesus over and against the ways of earthly powers. If Jesus is king then Caesar is not. If Jesus is my Lord, then all earthly powers and allegiances lose any ultimate claims to my loyalty and service.
If Jesus has special concern for the poor and marginalized combined with deep misgivings about the wealthy and powerful, then I must share his point of view. And this will demand that I speak out against the wealthy and powerful who do not work for the good of the "least of these," who do not seek justice and mercy for all people. If Jesus is my Lord, I must join him, and the tradition of the prophets in which he stands, to speak truth to power.
Or I could just believe in Jesus and ignore pretty much everyone he says. It turns out that is a lot easier.
Click to learn more about the lectionary.
Saturday, November 19, 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)