Sermons and thoughts on faith on Scripture from my time at Old Presbyterian Meeting House and Falls Church Presbyterian Church, plus sermons and postings from "Pastor James," my blog while pastor at Boulevard Presbyterian in Columbus, OH.
Tuesday, March 31, 2020
Sermon video: Resurrection Life
During this time of COVID-19, we are not posting audios of worship, but you can find sermon videos and the church website and videos of the worship services on the church Facebook page.
Sunday, March 29, 2020
Sermon: Resurrection Life
Resurrection Life
John 11:1-45
James Sledge March
29,2020
Often
at funerals, I open with a quote from our reading today. “I am the resurrection and the
life, (says the Lord). Those who believe in me, even though they
die, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die.” The
Presbyterian Book of Common Worship calls
a funeral “A Service of Witness to the Resurrection,” so that seems fitting.
I
also have vivid memories of using part of our gospel reading at the funeral
service of my father-in-law, Roy. I had just started seminary, taking an
intensive summer course in Greek before my first semester began. I had no
experience or training to do a funeral, but the pastor at his church was new,
and my mother-in-law wanted someone who knew Roy to speak.
I
talked about the tenderness and love of Jesus who was moved when he saw Mary
weeping, who despite knowing that he would shortly raise Lazarus from the dead,
nonetheless wept for him. But while I was well into my summer Greek course, I
still had a lot to learn about Greek and about using it to study scripture. And
so I didn’t realize that I misunderstood Jesus’ emotions.
Of
course there’s such a long history of reading these verses as examples of
Jesus’ compassion and humanity, that even Bible translators are wary of rendering
them in a straightforward manner. Our NRSV Bible says, When Jesus saw (Mary) weeping,
and the Jews who came with her also weeping, he was greatly disturbed in spirit
and deeply moved. But a more direct reading of the Greek would be
something like, he was deeply angry and agitated.
Sunday, March 22, 2020
Sermon: Here Is an Astonishing Thing
John 9:1-41
Here Is an
Astonishing Thing
James Sledge March
22.2020
I want to tell you a story. It
isn’t really a “true” story, at least not in the sense modern people tend to
use the word. The story doesn’t report actual events, but what the story talks
about has happened and does happen. In our own denomination, it happened only a
decade ago. In other denominations, the “truth” of this story is still on
display.
As graduation neared, a young
seminary student searched for a position as solo pastor of a small church. But
being female and single, many churches seemed hesitant to consider her. She
preached well, but didn’t fit the image that many seemed to have for a pastor.
Finally, she accepted the call of
a tiny, struggling – most would say dying – congregation in a small Alabama
town. Thirty people on Sunday was a big crowd, and finances were always a
problem. In three years without a pastor, they had saved up some money, but
even paying her the minimum salary the denomination allowed, they worried about
being able to afford her for more than a few years.
It wasn’t exactly what she had
dreamed of when she entered seminary, but it was where God had led her, and she
threw herself, heart and soul, into the work. She embraced and loved her
congregation, people very different in culture and background from
herself. Despite their small numbers and
paltry finances, she acted like they and their church mattered. She not only
loved and comforted them, she boldly proclaimed God’s word and challenged them
about where and how they would minister to their community.
Sunday, March 15, 2020
Tuesday, March 10, 2020
Sunday, March 8, 2020
Sermon: Getting Reborn
John 3:1-17
Getting Reborn
James Sledge March
8, 2020
I
have a love-hate relationship with today’s gospel reading. It is a beautiful
passage, filled with all manner of imagery and symbolism and nuance. But it
also has been much abused and so has a fair amount of baggage. For too many
these words are read as a litmus test. “Have you had a born again conversion
experience?” If not, you’re on the outside looking in.
This
passage is the rainbow wigged guy who used to go to sporting events and hold up
his John 3:16 sign. But that verse also gets reduced to formula. “Believe in
Jesus and you are saved.” Yet Nicodemus clearly believes in Jesus, believes he
is from God, but he leaves the scene more befuddled than when he first arrived.
Nick
is an interesting fellow. He comes in for his share of bad press, this guy who
can’t understand what Jesus is talking about. But Nick may be a lot like many
of us. He is a respected, educated member of his community, a leader in his
church. He’s a bright, rational fellow who is impressed by Jesus. Clearly Jesus
is someone special, and the wonderful things he does couldn’t happen if God was
not with him, could they?
Churches,
especially Mainline churches, are filled with people like Nick, people who are
drawn to Jesus but who also struggle to embrace him completely. We’ll listen to
him up to a point, but we’re often not quite sure what he’s saying, and so not
quite ready to go all in.
Nick
comes to see Jesus at night. That’s more than the time of day. Light and dark
are symbolic categories in John’s gospel, and Nick is not ready to step into
the light. Like some of us, he is drawn to Jesus but prefers to remain on the
periphery, in the shadows.
I’m
not entirely sure why Nick comes to see Jesus. If he has some question to ask
he never gets the chance. He barely gets the chance to make his introduction. “Hi,
Jesus. Great to meet you. Really impressed with what you’re doing. No doubt,
God is with you.” But before he can say more, Jesus speaks. He says that no one
can see the kingdom of God, can see God’s new day, without being born anothen. (a[nwqen)
Sunday, March 1, 2020
Sermon: Discovering Who We Are
Matthew 4:1-11
Discovering Who We Are
James Sledge March
1, 2020
Jesus
began his ministry in a world that was anxiously awaiting a Messiah. For a
variety of reasons, expectations of a savior were high. One group, the Essenes,
had withdrawn from society and set up an alternative community in the
wilderness so they would be ready. From some of their writings, popularly
called The Dead Sea Scrolls, we know that they expected a Messiah, or perhaps a
pair of Messiahs, who looked nothing like Jesus.
In
fact, ever since Israel had returned from exile in Babylon some 500 years
earlier, and the hoped for glorious revival of the kingdom of David had failed
to materialize, people had been looking for the One who would change all that.
People
carefully examined Scripture, finding those passages that seemed to offer clues
about where the Messiah would come from, how he would act, and what he would
do. But there was no single image that everyone agreed on. Even today,
Christian have many different images of Jesus. We agree that Jesus was Messiah,
and yet we still have a warrior Jesus, a hippy Jesus, a blonde-haired blue-eyed
Jesus, a meek and mild Jesus, a wise sage Jesus, a personal Savior Jesus, and
so on and so on.
So
if we can’t agree on the exact nature of Jesus, imagine how difficult it was
for people who only had verses from the Old Testament. How did they know which
verses were about the hoped for Messiah? How were they supposed to reconcile
verses that seemed to suggest different sorts of Messiahs?
Messiah
simply means “anointed one.” That title, along with “Son of God,” had long be
used to speak of Israel’s kings. So it’s hardly surprising that many expected
the Messiah would revive the days of King David. He would throw out the hated
Romans and their puppet, Herod. He would restore Israel to greatness.
Jesus
knew well the varied images and expectations of a Messiah. And if Jesus is
genuinely human, as Christians insist he is, then he must have wrestled with
just what it meant to be the Messiah. He must have prayed and struggled to
discern just what sort of Anointed One God wanted him to be.
Monday, February 24, 2020
Sunday, February 23, 2020
Semon: Listen to Him!
Matthew 17:1-9
Listen to Him!
James Sledge February
23, 2020
Lately
I’ve been thinking about quitting Facebook. Too much nastiness there, too many
conspiracy theories, too much political manipulation. And maybe Mark Zuckerberg
might address some of the damage Facebook does to our society if enough people
quit using it.
But
then some colleague or notable person that I follow posts something wonderful
that I would never have seen otherwise. That happened the other day when
Frederick Buechner posted something on his page. I may yet ditch Facebook, but
I’m glad I saw Buechner’s post.
For
those who don’t know of him, Buechner is a Presbyterian pastor who’s probably better
known for his novels, essays, and short stories. The other day he posted something
from an old book of his. It’s a bit longer than the typical sermon quote, but I
hope you’ll indulge me.
PREPOSITIONS CAN
BE VERY ELEGANT. A man is "in" architecture or a woman is
"in" teaching, we say, meaning that is what they do weekdays and how
they make enough money to enjoy themselves the rest of the time. But if we say
they are "into" these things, that is another story. "Into"
means something more like total immersion. They live and breathe what they do.
They take it home with them nights. They can't get enough of it. To be
"into" books means that just the sight of a signed first edition of
Alice's Adventures in Wonderland sets your heart pounding. To be "in"
books means selling them at B. Dalton's.
Along similar
lines, New Testament Greek speaks of believing "into" rather than
believing "in." In English we can perhaps convey the distinction best
by using either "in" or no preposition at all.
Believing in God
is an intellectual position. It need have no more effect on your life than
believing in Freud's method of interpreting dreams or the theory that Sir
Francis Bacon wrote Romeo and Juliet.
Believing God is
something else again. It is less a position than a journey, less a realization
than a relationship. It doesn't leave you cold like believing the world is
round. It stirs your blood like believing the world is a miracle. It affects
who you are and what you do with your life like believing your house is on fire
or somebody loves you.
We believe in
God when for one reason or another we choose to do so. We believe God when
somehow we run into God in a way that by and large leaves us no choice to do otherwise.
When Jesus says
that whoever believes "into" him shall never die, he does not mean
that to be willing to sign your name to the Nicene Creed guarantees eternal
life. Eternal life is not the result of believing in. It is the experience of believing.[1]
Sunday, February 16, 2020
Sermon: Catching the Dream
Matthew 5:21-37
Catching the Dream
James Sledge February
16, 2020
As
baseball fans are probably aware, Derek Jeter, longtime short stop for the New
York Yankees, was voted into the Hall of Fame last month. In other recent news,
Major League Baseball announced the results of its investigation into sign stealing
by the Houston Astros, including some of the harshest penalties ever handed
down by MLB. Many thought the penalties too lenient, and the scandal has raised
larger questions about cheating in baseball.
These
two, seemingly unrelated bits of baseball news reminded me of an episode from
Derek Jeter’s playing days. He was batting and squared around to bunt, but the
pitch was way inside. Jeter turned away as the pitch struck the bat right on
the knob at its base. He threw the bat away and began shaking his hand in pain.
The trainer ran out to examine his “injury,” and the umpire awarded him first
base. Jeter trotted down the base path still shaking off the pain.
But
replays showed that the baseball never came anywhere near Jeter’s hand. Jeter himself
later admitted as much. A debate ensued as to whether Jeter had pulled off a
savvy play or if he was a cheater, a debate that landed Jeter’s at-bat on the
evening news.
In
some ways, this debate depends on your view of rules. What are they for? Are
they simply meant to define limits and boundaries, or do they mean to create an
ethos, a way of doing things? Those who saw Jeter as a consummate competitor
understood winning as the ultimate goal which is to be pursued by whatever
means not actually prohibited, while those who thought him a cheater understood
the rules to create something bigger than winning.
All
of us function in a world filled with various sorts of rules. I remember going
into my daughters’ elementary school classrooms and seeing the “Class Rules”
listed on a poster. Every day most of us see speed limit signs that we sometimes
obey and sometimes don’t. And questions about whether speeding is wrong or if
it’s okay as long as you don’t go too much over or get caught perhaps mirror
questions about whether or not Derek Jeter cheated.
And
what about religious rules? The Bible is full of rules. There are well known
rules like the Ten Commandments. (At least their existence is well known; most
people can’t actually name them.) Then there are more obscure rules. Flip
through the pages of Leviticus or Deuteronomy some time. There’s a rule against
eating shellfish. And you’d better not be wearing clothing made of a blended
fabrics. If that label says “cotton/polyester” or “wool/cotton blend,” you’re
breaking the rules.
Of
course most of us don’t get too worried about those rules. We’re Christians,
and so we don’t have to obey all those Old Testament rules. As long as we
believe in Jesus, as long as we have faith, we’re okay.
Yet
in the portion of the Sermon on the Mount we heard last week, Jesus said that he
didn’t come to call off the Law but to fulfill it, that not a single letter of
the Law would pass away. And today, far from calling off rules, we hear Jesus
seeming to add to them. Don’t murder is doable for most of us, but Jesus
stretches the rule to include not getting angry. And in Jesus’ new version of
the rules a middle aged man going through a mid-life crisis needn’t have an
affair. He can just think about it, and it’s pretty much the same thing.
Sunday, February 9, 2020
Sermon: On Being Salt and Light
Matthew 5:13-20
On Being Salt and Light
James Sledge February
9, 2020
“You
are my sunshine, my only sunshine. You make me happy when skies are grey. You'll
never know, dear, how much I love you. Please
don't take my sunshine away.” For some reason this song
popped into my head when I was thinking about salt and light in our gospel
reading. I was wondering whether those words have the same impact they did in
Jesus’ time. They’re both rather mundane.
“Turn
on the light,” someone says, and we flip the switch. Light is everywhere. You
can’t see the stars very well at night in the DMV because there is so much
light. As long as the power doesn’t go out, we take it for granted, which may
be why I thought of the song. You are my sunshine sounds pretty impressive. I
get the metaphor of “You are the light of the world,” but it doesn’t sound as
impressive as sunshine
So
too with salt. A lot of us get too much of it. There’s nothing special about
salt. It’s nothing precious. No one would ever think of salt as an extravagant,
Valentine’s gift.
Yet
in ancient times, salt was often literally worth its weight in gold, one of the
most important commodities of the ancient world. It was used not only to season
food but to preserve it so it could be stored. It was used as an antiseptic; it
was required in the offerings made at the Jerusalem Temple. In some areas,
slabs of rock salt were used as coins.
Light
was also precious. In a world of candles and torches, oil lamps were cutting
edge technology. You had to buy oil to use them, and so no one lit a lamp and
put it under a bushel basket.
“You are the salt of the earth… You are
the light of the world.” Not something mundane or taken for
granted, but precious, valuable, essential for life.
Sunday, February 2, 2020
Sunday, January 26, 2020
Sermon: Slaves to Freedom
Matthew 4:12-23
Slaves to Freedom
James Sledge January
26, 2020
I
once saw a newspaper comic strip that depicted a teenager who was angry at his
parents for not letting him do something he wanted to do. He yelled, “I’ll be
glad when I’m 18 and no one can tell me what to do!” The final panel showed his
parents doubled over in laughter.
As
much as we celebrate freedom and individualism in this country, almost none of
us ever reach the point where no one can tell us what to do. It may be parents, a teacher, or professor;
it may be our boss; it may be the speed limit and the police radar gun, but much
of the time, we either do as others say or suffer the consequences.
We
often wish it were otherwise. That starts early. Toddlers love the word “No!”
Children and adults enjoy saying, “You can’t make me.” Part of American mythology is that anyone can
grow up to be whatever he or she wants to be. We know it’s not really true,
even if it’s truer here than in many countries. But still, we love the idea
that we’re free to become whatever we want, that we can simply decide, and if
we try hard enough, we will make it.
In
some countries, children are given aptitude tests and then slotted into certain
academic or vocational tracks as early as elementary school. That would never fly here.
Yet
despite this, people often ask themselves the question, “What should I do with
my life?” That’s a somewhat different question from “What do I want to do?” What
I want to do is about preference,
but what I should do speaks of
something outside myself having a say.
Sometimes
people go to career counseling services to help figure out what sort of thing
they should do. Some colleges offer such services to their students. People who
are thinking about changing careers sometimes use them. And our denomination
requires people who want to become pastors to be evaluated by a reputable
career center.
This
career counseling usually includes tests that chart personality, interests, and
aptitudes. The process assumes that certain traits are necessary for certain
careers. When I was 12, I would have loved to become a rock and roll star, but
it didn’t take all that many guitar lessons to make it obvious that would never
happen.
So
I’m wondering, what information would you consider in making a decision about
what you should do with your life? Whose
voice would you listen to; what authority would you recognize as having a say
in that decision?
And
this isn’t limited to decisions about career. Life is full of should questions. Where should I go to
college? Should I go to grad school? Should we get married? Should we have
children? How should we raise our children? How should we spend our
retirement? What should we do with our
estate? The list goes on and on. Perhaps you’re wrestling with such a question
right now.
How
do you answer such questions? Who and what get a say in answering the question,
“What should I do?”
Tuesday, January 21, 2020
Sunday, January 19, 2020
Sermon: Good News, Total Depravity, and the Lamb of God
John 1:29-42
Good News, Total Depravity, and the Lamb of God
January 19, 2020 James
Sledge
A
vaccine for polio was developed a couple of years before I was born. Prior to
that half a million people were killed or paralyzed by it each year. In 1952
nearly 60,000 US children contracted polio. Over 3000 died and more than 20,000
were left with some sort of paralysis.
The
vaccine was life-altering, front page news. Its developer, Jonas Salk, was a
national hero. I have vague recollections of mass immunization drives at
schools with public service announcements encouraging anyone who’d not yet been
vaccinated to show up, but by the time I was a teenager, you rarely heard
anything about polio. It became part of the normal routine, a required
vaccination, and there wasn’t a lot of need to get the news out anymore.
Our
gospel reading for today contains big, life-altering news from John the
Baptist. At least it’s front page news for Andrew, Simon Peter and others. “Here
is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world!” John tells
Andrew and he tells Simon Peter. If you keep reading more people get told, and
it won’t be long before crowds start to appear.
Sharing
good news is central to the biblical story of Jesus and the first Christians, so
much so that the our word “gospel” is simply an archaic synonym for “good
news.” And the word “evangelism” is just an anglicized version of the Greek
word meaning gospel or good news.
When
people met Jesus, when people encountered early Christian missionaries, were
baptized and received the Holy Spirit, they told others. It was life changing
news. How could they not. And so what started out a small, apocalyptic Jewish
movement swept over the entire Mediterranean world in short order, drawing in
both Jews and non-Jews.
But
eventually, Christianity became the religion of the Roman Empire. And then it
came to be expected, even required. Before long, Jesus wasn’t front page
news anymore. It was just one of those things you acquired by being a part of
the empire.
Even
after the Roman Empire fell, Christianity remained enmeshed in the empires and
states that followed. For much of the Western world, this Christendom persisted
into the 20th century. With a few exceptions, being Italian or
French or American meant you were expected to be Christian. And baptism was
often seen as a bit like a vaccination given to children. It was on the
checklist. Whooping cough, polio, measles, baptism.
A
lot of people lament the demise of this Christendom, but I’m not one of them.
In Christendom, faith often became just background noise. People blissfully
imagined that faith and nation were perfectly compatible. Not surprisingly,
this Christendom faith made wealth a virtue, supported slavery, was not much
troubled by the genocide of indigenous Americans, and thought God created Africans
inferior to serve whites.
Tomorrow
we honor Martin Luther King, Jr. who challenged the vapid faith of Christendom.
As part of the commemoration of his life and work, the television will show old,
black and white news footage from the Civil Rights movement. We’ll see police
dogs and fire hoses turned on peaceful marchers, and we’ll see police brutally,
sometimes gleefully, beating them, police who were upstanding members of their
local churches.
Occasionally when such events are being
discussed, people – always white people – will explain such behavior as “a product
of the time.” Similar arguments are made in opposition to removing statues of
southern, Civil War generals. They weren’t bad people. They were good people.
They were simply of their time. That was the problem. Not them, the time.
Wednesday, January 15, 2020
Sunday, January 12, 2020
Sermon: Remembering Who We Are
Matthew 3:13-17
Remembering Who We Are
James Sledge January
12, 2020 – Baptism of the Lord
It’s
an old joke, one I’m sure I’ve told before, so if you’ve heard it, please bear
with me. A group of pastors are meeting for lunch. As I assume happens with
other professions, such lunches often include a fair amount of talking shop.
There is some complaining and venting, some idea sharing. “What are y’all doing
for Lent this year?” and other such discussions.
At
this particular lunch, one of the pastors shared that they were having a
problem with bats at the church she served. They had discovered a huge colony
in the steeple and needed to get them out. She wondered if any of the other
pastors had experience with this sort of thing. She didn’t want to hurt the
bats but they were starting to make a pretty big mess.
One
colleague shared the name of a local pest removal company. Another suggested an
ultrasonic pest repeller, but the pastor said they’d already tried one of those
with no success.
Finally
another pastor said, “We had the same problem a few years ago and decided to
enroll them all in confirmation class. When it was over, we never saw them
again.”
For
those of you from other religious traditions, confirmation is step two in a
two-step process for becoming a full-fledged member of a Presbyterian church.
Step one is baptism, something that typically happens when a child is still an
infant. Confirmation, which includes making a public profession of faith, is
the confirming of those baptismal vows, claiming the faith of one’s parents or
guardians as one’s own.
Unfortunately,
confirmation has a long history of becoming a graduation from church. Children
are baptized, attend Sunday School as children, do confirmation as teens, and
pretty much disappear after that. For much of the 20th century, they
often returned to church when they married and had children of their own, but
that pattern has largely broken down. By the latter part of the 20th
century, many of those who graduated never came back.
I
sometimes wonder if we in the church didn’t set ourselves up for this. In a
variety of ways, we portrayed Christian faith as a status that one attains.
Some evangelicals talk about being born again or saved. But what comes after
that? We Presbyterians have rarely used the language of “born again” or being
“saved,” but we still tended to treat Christianity as a status. In many
congregations, Sunday School is seen as something for children. Presumably that
means you are done at some point. You’ve finished, graduated, gotten your Christianity
pin.
Some
parents skip a step and just make infant baptism the graduation. They “get the
baby done,” often at the urging of grandparents. And then they never go near church
again.
Thursday, January 2, 2020
Sunday, December 29, 2019
Sermon: Pharaoh and Herod vs God's Love
Matthew 2:13-23
Pharaoh and Herod vs God’s Love
James Sledge December
29, 2019
Every
evening when I drive home at this time of year, I pass by a house with an
elaborate nativity scene in the front yard. It’s not terribly realistic, but it
is huge, covering half of the front yard. It has steps that go up to the floor
where Mary, Joseph, and the baby Jesus are, along with wise men and some
animals.
The
holy family and their visitors are wooden, stylized figures, illuminated by strands
of Christmas lights. But on those steps leading up to the floor are two more
realistic figures. They are plastic, brightly colored, and glow from their own,
interior lighting. One is Santa Claus and the other is a snowman, Frosty
perhaps?
A
little odd, I suppose, but it’s hardly the first time I’ve seen Santa and the
manger side by side. I don’t suppose anyone actually thinks that Santa was
there at Jesus’ birth, but I can understand why people might add Santa to the
display. In popular imagination, the story of Jesus’ birth is a joyous, magical,
miraculous story, often depicted as sweet and idyllic, something straight out
of a Norman Rockwell painting.
Likewise
the story of Santa is also joyous and miraculous. It is full of warmth and
happiness and a sense of magic that even adults long for. It is easy to see why
people would feel that the two stories go well together.
It
may surprise some, considering all the attention we lavish on it, to realize
how little coverage the Christmas story gets from the Bible. Of the four
gospels, only Luke tells of Jesus in a manger. There’s no actual mention of a
stable, and many scholars think this manger was inside a home, in the area
where the animals were brought inside at night.
If
the nativity display at your house is like the one at mine, the Wise Men are
visiting the baby in the manger along with shepherds and angels. But the visit
of the Magi doesn’t quite belong with Christmas. Young Jesus is likely a
toddler in this story from Matthew’s gospel, a story that ends with the
fearsome, frightening events from our scripture reading this morning. All the male
children two years old and under in the little hamlet of Bethlehem are taken
from their parents by government officials, and then killed.
The gospel writer borrows a line from
the prophet Jeremiah to describe the scene. The words originally spoke
metaphorically of the children of Israel carried off into exile while Rachel,
one of Israel’s founding matriarchs, weeps for them. But now the metaphor has
turned literal. “A voice was heard in Ramah, wailing and loud
lamentation, Rachel weeping for her children; she refused to be consoled,
because they are no more.”
Sunday, December 22, 2019
Sermon: The Threat of Christmas
Matthew 1:18-25
The Threat of Christmas
James Sledge December
22, 2019
Her husband Joseph, being a righteous man and
unwilling to expose her to public disgrace, planned to dismiss her quietly. “A righteous
man.” Outside of the Bible, I’m not sure I’ve ever heard anyone actually
described that way. Have you? I can’t think of a single example. For that
matter, I almost never hear the word righteous at all, other than to speak disparagingly
of someone who is “self-righteous.”
Some
Bible translations try something else: a just man, a man of honor, a noble man,
a good man. Unlike righteous, I’ve heard people described as good, noble, honorable,
or just, and meant in a complimentary way. Righteous, however, just isn’t part
of our everyday vocabulary. Unfortunately, I’m not sure that any of those other
words quite capture what the gospel writer is trying to say.
To
say that Joseph is a righteous man is to say that he is faithful in keeping
God’s law. He is more than simply good. He lives his life by God’s
commandments. He is guided by the principles laid out in the Torah, and Torah
says he should divorce Mary.
Divorce
is required because Mary’s engagement to Joseph is something very different from
engagement in our day. When two people get engaged in our culture, they have
declared their intent to marry, but there’s no legal change of status. They are
still single and, should they call off the engagement, the only issues to
navigate depend on how far along things are. It could be a simple as letting
friends and family know that the wedding is off. Or it could involve unbooking
reception venues and dealing with angry members of the wedding party who’ve
already bought bridesmaid dresses or non-refundable airline tickets. But
regardless of how easy or complicated, calling the wedding off doesn’t require
any legal action to undo the engagement.
Not
the case for Joseph and Mary. Their engagement is as legally binding as
marriage is for us. It cannot be called off. It can only end with a divorce.
I
can only imagine what goes through Joseph’s mind when he learns that Mary is
pregnant. He might feel betrayed, although if this is an arranged marriage,
perhaps not. In the eyes of the Law, however, Joseph has been wronged. He has
made Mary his wife, even if the final formalities are yet to come, but now that
Joseph has learned of her presumed adultery, he must divorce her, regardless of
what he does or doesn’t feel for her.
Thursday, December 19, 2019
Sunday, December 8, 2019
Sermon: Needing John (and Accountability) for Advent
Matthew 3:1-12
Needing John (and Accountability) for Advent
James Sledge December
8, 2019
Many
of you are aware that the Scripture passages used in worship each week come
from something called a lectionary, in our case the Revised Common Lectionary.
This is a published list of readings for each Sunday, typically with a reading
from the Old Testament, a psalm, a passage from an epistle or letter, and a
gospel reading. We never use all the readings, but on most Sundays, we use some
of them.
The
lectionary follows a three year cycle, imaginatively titled years A, B, and C.
Year A features the Gospel of Matthew, year B, Mark, and year C, Luke. The
Gospel of John doesn’t get a year but gets woven into all three. As we entered
into Advent last Sunday, we transitioned from Year C to A, and so we hear from
Matthew today.
If you looked at all the passages listed
in the lectionary for Advent, you might be surprised to discover that none
sound very Christmassy until the gospel reading on December 22. And John the
Baptist shows up on both the second and third Sunday in Advent. A person
unfamiliar with church who happened to wander into our worship on those Sundays
could be forgiven for suspecting that we didn’t realize what time of year it
was. Do we really need to hear from John
so much and so close to Christmas?
Monday, December 2, 2019
Sunday, December 1, 2019
Sermon: Advent, Eschatology, and Moral Arcs
Isaiah 2:1-5
Advent, Eschatology, and Moral Arcs
James Sledge December
1, 2019
Recently I’ve seen a number of articles and posts on social media commemorating thirty years since the fall of the Berlin Wall. What a momentous time. The Soviet Union collapsed. East and West Germany became one country. Former puppet regimes began new lives as independent nations. And people heralded the end of the Cold War.
There
was great hope for the future and talk of a “peace dividend.” America was the
sole remaining superpower, and many hoped that military spending could be
curtailed, allowing increased funding for social programs, education,
infrastructure projects, and so on.
There
were reductions in nuclear arsenals. Military spending remained flat for a few
years, but no big peace dividend materialized. After 9/11, military spending increased
dramatically, and we’ve been in an endless “war on terror” ever since. Now
Russia’s war in Ukraine and interference in US elections feels a little like a
return to Cold War days.
Through
much of history, hopes for peace often seem to disappear like mist burned away
by the morning sun. “Peace on Earth” will soon by plastered all over Christmas
cards and Christmas displays, but our hopes for peace always seem to get
overwhelmed by our tendency towards violence and war.
Back
in 1928, France, the US, and Germany signed something called the “General Treaty for Renunciation of War as an
Instrument of National Policy,” better known as the “Kellogg-Briand
Pact.” By the time the treaty went into effect a year later, the majority of
the world’s nations had signed it, including all the major players in World War
II, which would begin only ten years later.
Sunday, November 24, 2019
Sermon: Failing the Cowboy Test
Luke 23:33-43
Failing the Cowboy
Test
James Sledge November
24, 2019
I was sitting on the couch
watching television the other night. More accurately, I was looking for
something to watch. I pulled up the channel guide and scrolled through it, but
nothing really grabbed me. As I got to the very end, I saw a listing that read
simply, “Cheyenne.”
I used to watch a show called
Cheyenne when I was a little boy, and so I clicked on it to see if it was that.
Sure enough, there, in beautiful black and white, was Clint Walker starring as
Cheyenne Bodie.
Now I suspect that many of you
have never heard of either Cheyenne Bodie or the actor who played him, but the
show was a huge success when it aired from the mid-1950s to early 60s. According
to Wikipedia, it was the first hour-long Western and the first hour-long
dramatic series of any sort to last more than a single season.
Cheyenne was a large and muscular, but a gentle fellow, at least until someone needed justice. Then he was more than willing to use his brawn, or his gun, to set things right.
Cheyenne was a large and muscular, but a gentle fellow, at least until someone needed justice. Then he was more than willing to use his brawn, or his gun, to set things right.
Cowboy heroes were all over the
television when I was a boy, both in afternoon reruns and in primetime. There
were many variations in the slew of Westerns that filled the airways, but in
most all of them, the dramatic climax of the show came when good defeated evil
in a fist fight or a gunfight. Good put evil in its place, and, for a moment at
least, things were right with the world again.
My and many others’ notions of
heroism and bravery and masculinity were shaped by Cheyenne and the Lone Ranger
and Marshall Dillon and Roy Rogers and on and on and on. These heroes weren’t
afraid to fight for what they believed in, even when the odds were against
them. A real hero, a real man, might not want to fight, but he was more than
ready to do so in order to defend himself or others.
I wonder if this isn’t one reason
that so many of us Christians struggle with following Jesus. He asks us to live
in ways that are contrary to accepted notions of strength, of bravery, of
masculinity, of might and right. He tells us not to fight back. He tells us to
love our enemy. He says not to seek restitution when someone takes something
from us.
Jesus fails miserably at the
cowboy test, the superhero test. Yes, he does best his opponents in verbal
repartee on a regular basis, but when push comes to shove, he refuses to fight
back. When he is arrested, he goes meekly. When people give false testimony at
his trial, he makes no attempt to defend himself. When he is convicted for
being a political threat to the empire, he raises no objection. No wonder that
when the risen Jesus comes along a pair of his disciples on the afternoon of
that first Easter, they say of him, “But we had hoped that he was the one…” They
had hoped, but clearly he was not. If he had been, he would not have gone down
without a fight. If he had been, it wouldn’t have ended like this.
Sunday, November 17, 2019
Sermon: Saying "Yes" to God's New Day
Isaiah 65:17-25
Saying “Yes” to God’s New Day
James Sledge November
17, 2019
A
few weeks ago, one of my Facebook “friends” posted this on her page. “When the
time changes next weekend could we please go back to 1965 when life was
simple!!!!! I think most will agree the 60’s were the best years of their
life!!!”
“Most” here obviously doesn’t include anyone born
after 1970. It might not include those who served or lost loved ones in
Vietnam. It’s probably doesn’t include civil rights marchers who faced dogs,
fire hoses, beatings, and death threats. But for many, including an eight year
old me, it did seem a wonderful, simple time. We lived what I thought was the
nearly idyllic life of a typical suburban family. Oh, for life to be that easy
again.
Nostalgia
is a way that many of us react when things are not going as well as we’d like. As
with my Facebook “friend,” it usually involves some selective remembering that
focuses on the good and forgets the bad. Those who want to make America great
again, recall a time when American was in its ascendency, the preeminent
superpower with a growing middle class, burgeoning suburbs, and an interstate
highway system beginning to be built. Of course this nostalgia forgets the large
numbers of people who were systemically excluded because of race, gender, sexual orientation, and so on.
It forgets the ecological damage being done without the least bit of concern.
There’s
a lot of nostalgia in the church these days. Remember when the sanctuary was
always full? Remember when the confirmation class had forty youth in it?
Remember when we couldn’t find enough rooms for all the Sunday School classes?
Remember?
Of
course nostalgia forgets that 1950s Christianity often actively supported laws
enforcing racial segregation and criminalizing sexual orientations or behaviors
seen as “deviant,” The Church gave religious sanction to American society,
speaking in biblical terms of a new Jerusalem, in exchange for the culture all
but requiring people to participate in religion. But it was an easier time to
be church, although Jesus did say that following him would be difficult.
Tuesday, November 12, 2019
Sunday, November 10, 2019
Sermon: Rightly Ordered Priorities
Rightly Ordered Priorities
James Sledge November
10, 2019
I’m
not sure when children’s sermons became a standard part of American worship
services, but my church had them when I was a child. As with other elements of
worship, there are resource books on children’s sermons. I have a couple of old
ones that a retiring pastor gave me. Unfortunately, almost all the ideas are
object lessons, practical examples used to explain more abstract ideas about
faith. But child development experts say that object lesson don’t work with
young children whose thinking is too concrete, which explains why it is often
adults who enjoy the children’s sermons while the little ones fidget through
them.
A
colleague once shared with me a children’s sermon on tithing. I really like it,
but it’s another object lesson. And so I’m using it in a regular sermon. A
basket of ten apples represents a person’s income. Our faith says that all we
have is a gift from God. The only thing God asks is that we use the first part
of our gifts to do God’s work.
God
has given me ten apples. A tithe would be one of them, so I will give one apple
back to God. And I still have a whole basket full to use for the things I need
and want.
But
very often, people don’t do it that way. I take my ten apples and buy a car and
food, pay rent, take a vacation, fund hobbies, pay for streaming and cell
service, and so on until little is left. Then I think about giving to God, but it
would be everything I’ve got.
I
can’t imagine that many young children ever made head nor tails of this lesson,
but the point is a good one for those of us old enough to understand. The
practice of generosity is much, much easier when it comes first. It is
difficult to be generous when you only give from what is left over after you
are done.
That’s
true of faith and discipleship in general. If we seek to follow Jesus, to pray,
study, serve others, worship, and so on, only after we’ve done everything else
we need and want, there is never enough time or money left over.
Faith,
discipleship, true spirituality, are largely about getting life rightly ordered.
On some level, we know this intuitively. You may have heard the adage, “No one on their deathbed
ever said, ‘I wish I’d spent more time at the office.’” We nod our heads in
agreement yet we still struggle with disordered priorities.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)