Exodus 20:8-11, 17
Curing Restless Acquisition Syndrome
Sabbath and the Tenth Commandment
James Sledge August
3, 2014
For
all the attention that the Ten Commandments have received in recent years via
court cases and movements to affix them to public buildings, I’ve never heard
much discussion of the final commandment on the list, the one against coveting.
That’s too bad because it’s one of the more interesting commandments. But it’s
also understandable. What do you do with a commandment against wanting things
that other people have?
Does
God really get upset if I look at my neighbors nice, new Lexus and say to
myself, “Man, I’d really like to have that car.”? What if someone finds her
neighbor’s husband attractive and does a little flirting with him at a party?
Where exactly are the lines with coveting? What exactly is the point of this
command?
In
truth, the command is not really a prohibition on wanting things that belong to
others. The word translated “covet” refers not simply to desire, but inordinate
desire, desire that leads to action and undermines the neighborly community that
God dreams for humanity.
I
think a lot of people assume that coveting is about people with less wanting
what people with more have. But in the Bible, coveting usually works the other
way round. It is about those with a lot wanting – and seizing –what belongs to
those with little.
There
are a number of coveting stories in the Bible. Some prominent ones involve
kings, who have a lot. King David murders Bathsheba’s husband because he
coveted her. But perhaps the epitome of coveting stories is the tale of
Naboth’s vineyard, one of the cycle of stories around the prophet Elijah.
Naboth
was just an ordinary guy who had the terrible misfortune to own a vineyard next
door to King Ahab’s palace. Ahab thought it a choice spot to acquire, a great
place to add a garden. And so he offered to purchase it. No real problem with the
story so far.
But
Naboth doesn’t want to part with his land, telling Ahab, “Yahweh forbid that I should give
you my ancestral inheritance.” Naboth invokes God’s name because
ancestral land was God’s doing. It was part of God’s design for a unique,
neighborly community in which the wealthy would not acquire more and more, and
the poor would not become destitute because hard times forced them to sell the
family farm. God’s law even required that such land revert back to its
ancestral family every fifty years, insuring that everyone would maintain a
rightful share of the land. But of course the powerful and the wealthy, and
especially kings, could usually find loopholes and ways around such
regulations.
Ahab
is none too happy that Naboth won’t sell, and he begins to pout. This allows
Ahab’s wife, Jezebel, to enter the narrative. Jezebel is quite the villainess.
I don’t know if that’s accurate history or if her nastiness is overplayed by
the men who wrote the Bible. Always nice to have a woman around to blame. Just
ask Eve.
Anyway,
Jezebel points out the obvious. Ahab is king and can get what he wants. She then
proceeds to manufacture a scenario where Naboth is falsely accused of cursing
both God and Ahab, crimes punishable by death. And so poor Naboth ends up
losing his life and his land, and Ahab, with Jezebel’s help, acquires what he
was after, what he coveted.
Now Ahab has been a rotten king from the
get go. And Jezebel had once tried, unsuccessfully, to have the prophet Elijah
killed. But it is the events of Ahab and Jezebel’s coveting that finally cause
God to pass judgment. Because of Naboth, Ahab’s lineage will no longer rule
Israel, and Jezebel will suffer a particularly gory fate.
In
Israel, kings were supposed to be God’s shepherds, watching over and protecting
the flock. They were supposed to insure that Israel’s life was organized around
God and God’s neighborly community, but all too often, kings became focused on
acquiring more rather than maintaining God’s curious notion of a community
focused on the good of one’s neighbor.
At
first glance, this seems rather bizarre behavior. Kings enjoy all manner of
perks and benefits and luxuries by virtue of being king. There is no real
chance that they will become destitute and not have enough, so why can’t they stay
focused on being good shepherds?
It
would seem that the problem of coveting is a powerful force to distort life and
deflect people from their true purposes. It’s no less so today. Why on earth
would someone like Martha Stewart, successful, overseeing a huge business
empire, and worth almost a billion dollars, risk going to jail over an illegal
stock trade that netted her about $45,000? Clearly she, along with many of us, is
afflicted with something I’ll call restless
acquisition syndrome. This is a restlessness
that often drives people to self-destructive behavior. Billionaire Martha
Stewart went to prison over $45,000. People go into crippling debt to acquire
all those things they must have. Politician of all stripes want more power and
will do most anything to get it or keep it. Corporations and the wealthy spend
millions lobbying and cultivating politicians so that they can gain every
possible advantage to feed their restless
acquisition syndrome.
This syndrome, which clearly infects
modern and ancient people alike, likely explains why so much ink gets spilled
on two of the Ten Commandments, the one on Sabbath and the one on coveting. Together
these two commands seek to tame our restlessness and inordinate desire, to
point us toward towards a different sort of life and community, one organized
around love of God and love of neighbor, the ultimate cure for restless acquisition syndrome.
____________________________________________________________________________
More than 1500 years ago, St. Augustine,
an early Christian theologian and bishop in what is now Algeria wrote these
words. “You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our
hearts are restless until they
rest in you.” (Confessions, I.1) There is a restlessness that troubles us, a
dis-ease that drives us, until we find our true purpose, life organized around
God and neighbor.
However, much in our society encourages
us to organize life around acquiring more and more. But as the commandments and
Jesus make abundantly clear, life organized around acquisition
rather than around God and neighbor is a life wrongly organized. It is a
disordered life.
Sabbath
rest and no coveting are about life rightly organized. The disciplined
cessation of restless acquisition allows us to shift gears and experience life
that is not about a frantic, endless pursuit of more, but a confident, faithful
trusting in God’s enough. And such faithful trusting upends the need to
outcompete or outmaneuver my neighbor in the quest for more, allowing the
creation of a truly neighborly community, even a neighborly world.
I’ll
wrap up this sermon, and this sermon series, with some words from the final
paragraph of the book that inspired both. “ ‘No-Sabbath’ existence imagines
getting through on our own, surrounded by commodities to accumulate and before
which to bow down. But a commodity cannot hold one’s hand… (Hopefully we will
come to realize this) …but likely not without Sabbath, a rest rooted in God’s
own restfulness and extended to our neighbors who also must rest. We, with our
hurts, fears, and exhaustion, are left restless until then.”[1]
This is the last in
a 6-part sermon series based in Walter Brueggemann’s book, Sabbath as Resistance: Saying No to the Culture of Now. Each sermon
is inspired by one of the six chapters in that book. The final chapter is
“Sabbath and the Tenth Commandment.”
[1] Brueggemann,
Walter (2014-01-31). Sabbath as Resistance: (p. 89). Westminster John Knox
Press. Kindle Edition.
No comments:
Post a Comment