Sunday, September 17, 2017

Sermon: Absurd Love - Absurd Community

Matthew 18:21-35
Absurd Love – Absurd Community
James Sledge                                                                           September 17, 2017

The problem of needing to know more about a scripture passage’s context in order to understand it has showed up so frequently of late that I wonder if we don’t need a Bible version of that real estate adage, “What are the three most important things in real estate? Location, location, location.” Except our answer would be “Context, context, context.”
Take today’s reading. It’s not a stand-alone parable. Our verses are the final lesson in a larger set of teachings, the last big teaching moment Jesus has with his disciples prior to Jerusalem and the cross. That says something about their importance. And because Matthew uses private moments with the disciples for Jesus to speak directly to the Church, that says something about how important these words are for us.
There is an interesting ebb and flow in these teachings. They start with Jesus saying that we must become like children to be part of God’s kingdom, that those who are humble like a child are called greatest in the kingdom. Jesus then shifts from actual children to “little ones,” a phrase that speaks of those new to faith. Here the emphasis is about how terrible it is to cause a little one to stumble, and about the great lengths we must be willing to go to avoid stumbling ourselves. Jesus goes on to say how important these “little ones” are to God, telling the parable of a shepherd who leaves the ninety-nine sheep to find the single lost one.
Jesus then shifts gears, insisting that this community also be a place that holds its members accountable. He lays out a method for confronting those who sin. Meet privately first. If that doesn’t work, a few members should speak to the person. If that fails the entire congregation gets involved, and finally, the offender is to be cast out.
It is in this context of holding community members accountable that Peter speaks in our reading this morning. Quite likely Peter is thinking of the elaborate process Jesus has described of confronting offenders alone, then with a few members, then before the congregation. Perhaps Peter has in mind some difficult folks he worries will abuse this process. They’ll cause trouble and resist correction until they’re on the verge of being thrown out. But later they’ll go back to their old ways, and the process would start over again. Surely there have to be some limits to this. “Is seven times enough, Jesus?”

No, says Jesus. Seventy-seven times. Or seventy times seven; either translation is possible, and either is probably just an absurdly high number that says, “Keep on forgiving.”
Then Jesus tells his parable. It clearly addressees Peter’s question, but it surely goes with all those other teachings where humility makes one great, where little ones are treasured and protected, but where there is accountability and correction. This parable surly means to say something about the nature and character of the community laid out in Jesus’ teachings.
The parable is filled with absurdities, some that we may miss. It may help to recall that slavery in Jesus’ day was quite different from our American experience of slavery. It was neither racially based nor understood to be permanent. People sometimes sold themselves into slavery to deal with a financial crisis, hoping to buy themselves back out at some point.
Slavery was still a cruel institution, but because of its more fluid nature, slaves often moved up into important positions in the masters’ businesses and enterprises. Some slaves might literally be running the business, managing large holdings of money and goods. That meant that an unscrupulous slave could indeed do a bit of embezzling, but in no reality based scenario could a slave have been caught owing the master 10,000 talents. We’re talking billions of dollars here. A single talent was about 15 years wages for a laborer.
One absurdity in the parable leads to another. Confronted with this debt of billions, the slave pleads, “Have patience with me, and I will pay you everything.” Right. And just where is he going to get the money. If he gets a job and gives everything to the master, it will take him 150,000 years to make 10,000 talents.
And so the master responds with another absurdity. “You know what, I feel bad for you. Cancel the debt. You’re free to go.” In what universe would that ever happen?
But the parable has one final absurdity. This slave who has just had a multi-billion dollar slate wiped clean runs into another slave who owes him some money. The amount here is believable, in the thousands. Perhaps he’d loaned his friend money to help buy a new car. Who knows. But he demands that the money be repaid immediately.
Just like the slave who owed billions, the slave owing thousands pleads, “Have patience with me, and I will pay you.” Except this seems doable. The debt is small and he will surely be able to pay it off, but he receives no mercy at all.
The parable offers no explanation for the first slave’s bizarre behavior. Of all people, you’d think he would be understanding, would have mercy and compassion. Yet he shows no pity, an absurdity as large as his master’s, but in the opposite direction.
What on earth would compel someone to act in such absurd fashion? Perhaps the parable is simply using absurdity for emphasis. Perhaps, but Jesus tells the parable to address a real issue, a real tendency to act as this unforgiving slave does. So what concern about members of the Church, about us, does Jesus use this parable to name, in exaggerated fashion
_____________________________________________________________________________
 The other day I was channel surfing and came across a movie from a few years ago, Barney’s Version. Paul Giamatti plays Barney, a deeply flawed TV producer. His best friend is a handsome, even more flawed writer named Boogie, who drinks and parties his way through life without much thought for the people he hurts along the way. On one occasion Barney bails his friend out of big mess and is betrayed in particularly egregious fashion for his trouble. In the argument that follows, Barneys laments that his friend has not even attempted to apologize.  Boogie responds, “I’ve got another book for you to read, Barney, The Life of Heinrich Heine, who on his deathbed was begged by his family to plead for God’s forgiveness but replied, ‘Surely God will forgive me. It’s his (expletive) job.’ ”[1]
I’ve known people who viewed their parents a big like this, who saw them primarily as a resource to tapp into, who never seemed to understand the love that motivated their parents to be there for them. And so they did not know how to love their parents back, did not have any sense of the pain they caused, much less any remorse for it.
I know a lot of religions folks who think of God, faith, or spirituality, primarily as resources to draw on. I’ve certainly found myself in that place, wanting things from God but oblivious to the love that motivates God or the pain that I cause God, scarcely thinking about how I might love God back.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Some Christians think of the cross as part of a magic formula that gets people into heaven, a slight of hand that has to take place to placate God, who would otherwise have to punish us. But the cross is not that at all. It isn’t God firing a bullet and then sending Jesus to jump in front of the bullet. Rather, the cross is the ultimate picture of God’s love that goes to absurd lengths to reach us, the picture of love that will not give up hope on restoring relationship, no matter how impossible that seems, no matter what absurd acts are required.
And the God whose absurd love comes to us in Jesus, expects that the community gathered in Christ’s name will share in this absurdity, will model this absurdity for the world. And when we truly encounter and understand the depths of God’s absurd love for us, each and every one of us no matter who we are or what we have done or failed to do, then becoming an absurd, counter-cultural community of love and welcome and forgiveness and grace will not seem absurd at all. It will be the natural behavior of beloved children of God.



[1] Boogie paraphrases the quote generally attributed to Heine. “Of course he will forgive me. That’s his job”

No comments:

Post a Comment