"For you always have the poor with you, and you can show kindness to them whenever you wish; but you will not always have me." These words, or at least some paraphrase of them, seem to be quite well known. Jesus utters them in response to his disciples' scolding of a woman for pouring an extremely expensive jar of perfume like ointment on Jesus. (The jar of ointment apparently cost nearly a year's salary.) The disciples think that this extravagance would have been better used if it had been sold and the money used to help others, and 300 denarii would have been able to do quite a bit of good. But Jesus praises the woman for what she has done.
But for some reason, Jesus' remark about there always being poor folk has received much of the attention. I have often heard the passage used as a general justification for not helping the poor. After all, you'll never solve the problem. Go ahead, enjoy whatever extravagances you want. Jesus did.
Of course that is not at all what Jesus said. To begin with, Jesus is talking to his disciples, and quite clearly the problem of poverty will not be solved in their lifetime. And so they will have ongoing opportunity to show kindness to the poor, as Jesus clearly expects them to do. And the extravagance in this passage is not a personal gift to oneself. Rather it is an act of love, the sort of extravagance one lover gives to another. This sort of extravagance is not self serving or manipulative. It rushes from the heart, sometimes without much rational thought.
It seems to me that Jesus points out to his disciples, and us, that faith is not a purely utilitarian enterprise. Yes, he does come to bring good news to the poor, but Jesus is about more than a social agenda. He is about love, both love of God and love of neighbor. And love often has a tendency to issue forth in extrvagance.
By personal inclination, I'm a bit inclined to side with the disciples. When you consider all the money that gets spent on religion, couldn't it be better used to alleviate hunger and suffering? And indeed, some of the marvelous church architecture, music, and artistry is a mixed bag. It is sometimes hard to tell if these are extravagances offered to God or monuments to those who created them. But I think Jesus' words are meant to be of help to us here.
Jesus does not provide us any easy litmus test. Rather this is a heart matter. The question is whether or not the extravagance is an act of love given to another. All extravagances don't count. The old joke about a husband giving his wife another very expensive gift each time he cheats on her is an obvious example of a self-serving extravagance. It seems less motivated by love than by guilt or fear or the idea of a payoff. But loving God with all your being and your neighbor as yourself produces a different sort of extravagance, or at least an extravagance with very different motivations.
Institutional religion sometimes breeds institutional faith. And I suspect that the fascination with spirituality in our age is in part a hunger for something a little less institutional, something that flows from the heart. Jesus praises this woman's costly gift because it is a heartfelt extravagance offered in love. But the minute we start trying to deduce formulas from this episode, to justify not doing more for the poor and so on, we have left the realm of love and the heart.
I wonder how much of my faith life actually emanates from love? How much of my work, my service, my worship, my giving, my prayer, etc. is an extravagance that pours out from my heart, offered as a present to God or to "the least of these" in whom Jesus is found? And how much of my faith life is a bit more calculated and self-serving. I don't think any formula can answer such questions. The answers require looking deep within my heart.
Click to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
No comments:
Post a Comment