Many
church people would likely nod in assent if someone spoke of faith as
"loving God and loving neighbor." Loving one's neighbor may be difficult
at times, but it's fairly easy to come up with a long list of things
that fit into that category. I'm not sure the same can be said for
loving God.
What
exactly does it look like to love God? What things count for and
against it? Those who speak of Christians as hypocrites suggest we think
attending worship and believing in Jesus suffice. Churches certainly
have their share of hypocrisy, but many people diligently seek to live
their faith. Even so, they may struggle with what it looks like to love
God.
Thoughts on what loving God looks like arose for me after reading Fr. Richard Rohr's daily devotion. He tells of a sidewalk frequented by the homeless of Albuquerque, NM, where he once observed something written in chalk. “I
watch
how foolishly man guards his nothing—thereby keeping us out. Truly God
is
hated here.”I thought of all the church congregations in this country,
many of them segregated by income level as well as race, and pondered
that phrase, "thereby keeping us out."
But
Rohr's quote wasn't nearly so troubling as the lectionary verses from 1
Samuel. There the newly anointed King Saul is rejected by God. Here
loving God is equated with obedience, and Saul's failure is not bringing
total destruction on the Amalekites. He was supposed to commit genocide
as well as kill every animal, but Saul spares their king and keeps the
good animals and other booty. (He later claims he is bringing them as a
offering for God.) Issues of compassion are not raised here. Saul kills
all the women and children. The only issue is his absolute devotion to
God, or the lack of it.
This
is not the only time genocide is commanded by God in the Old Testament.
Historically speaking, this was a violent time and it was not uncommon
for conquorers to wipe out entire towns, but I don't know that context
makes God come off much better.
Strangely
enough this story may be, in part, Israel wrestling with questions
about what it looks like to love God. When Jerusalem was destroyed and
its leaders and intelligentsia taken into exile, much soul searching
took place about how Israel had failed to be the covenant community God
had called them to be. They had loved God when it was easy and
convenient and ignored God when it suited them. One way they had been
"unfaithful" was in hedging their bets by dabbling in the religious
practices of their non-Israelite neighbors. The local Canaanite gods and
goddesses were of the fertility variety, and fertility is a big issue
in agriculture. So a sacrifice here and there to Baal was a bit of crop
insurance.
But
in light of defeat and exile, Israel contemplated her failure to love
God with total devotion. One obvious problem: they had not been pure
enough. They had not totally wiped out those Canaanites whose religious
practices had tempted them. The Old Testament is hardly of one mind on
this. There are regular commands to care for the sojourner and alien,
and the book of Ruth celebrates the devotion of a non-Israelite. But
clearly there was a school of thought in Israel that equated loving God
with a purity requiring genocide.
This
school of thought still has its adherents. They don't generally favor
genocide these days, but their love of God does come with a fair amount
of hatred for the impure, the heretic, the pagan, etc. Such folks
usually refuse to acknowledge the varied witness of scripture on this
and other issues. The Bible is in full agreement that total devotion to
God is required, but just what that looks like is debated within
scripture itself. Some of the prophets point to Israel's failure to do
justice and care for the poor as the real failure of love. And those who
demand covenant purity sometimes seem to forget that the original
covenant with Abraham and Sarah promised that through them, "all the
families of the earth shall be blessed."
This
bedrock covenant of Israel is cosmic in scope, but Israel, just like
religious folks today, were prone to narrow its focus and constrict it
to their purposes. And the resulting biases find their way into sacred
scripture. It is all too easy to spot, both in Old and New Testaments.
Fortunately
for Christians, we have a remarkable example of what loving God looks
like, namely Jesus. And while this example sets a very high bar, it is
amazingly devoid of any zealotry aimed against outsiders (though later
followers of Jesus would add that). Jesus' take on devotion and love for
God demands much of us, but in service to others and not at their
expense. Jesus seems totally to reject the school of thought that would
connect devotion and purity to genocide, not that this has always
restrained his adherents.
And
so I find myself back at that indictment in the quote from Rohr. "Truly
God is hated here." I know people who are very angry with God. I know
people who don't believe in God, some whose disbelief is so intense they
despise people who do believe in God. But I've rarely met anyone who
claimed to hate God other than in a fit of pique. So how should we
describe ourselves when we deliberately live in ways we know are at odds
with what God wants and expects?
This
post is a lot longer, and probably more rambling, than most. That's a
sure sign of my own internal wrestling on this for my own life of faith,
including its many failures and refusals to trust that God/Jesus' way
is the right one. Do I love God? Do I hate God? Or am I so lukewarm that
neither really applies?
Click to learn more about the lectionary.
No comments:
Post a Comment