I got back into town around midnight this morning after a lot of driving and a busy weekend in Boston, all of it occasioned by my daughter's graduation from Boston University. I can't say that I have a good sense of what this year's college graduates think about the future, but I get the impression that this generation expects to do big things. I suppose that's true of all graduates, but I also think that this generation is part of big shifts on multiple fronts, from technological to political. I hear voices of optimism and idealism beyond that which simply accompanies being young. These graduates are very different from me in many ways, and they may be ready to push the Baby Boomers off the stage ( though I doubt the Boomers will go quietly.)
All this makes me wonder what these graduates will be thinking when they're in my shoes, watching their own children graduate. How connected will they still be to their current hopes, causes, and ideals? How much will they have changed the world? And what of that will be for the better and what for the worse?
Today's reading from Deuteronomy raises similar questions. As Israel prepares to enter the Promised Land, Moses gives them a commencement address of sorts. ""Take care that you do not forget the Lord your God, by failing to keep his commandments, his ordinances, and his statutes, which I am commanding you today. When you have eaten your fill and have built fine houses and live in them, and when your herds and flocks have multiplied, and your silver and gold is multiplied, and all that you have is multiplied, then do not exalt yourself, forgetting the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery."
Sometimes life can have a way of narrowing people's focus. Worries about my career, my family, my retirement account, my children's education, and so on can push aside the great hopes and dreams of youth, can cause meto forget. Some loss of youthful idealism is likely required to acquire true wisdom, but the loss of hopes and dreams to concerns about me and mine is a real tragedy.
Religious institutions regularly demonstrate this as they become more focused on their own survival, on maintaining their structures, and on keeping their constituents happy, rather than on the hopes and dreams of God's kingdom, on the triumph of love over hate and peace over war, on the hope and dream of God's power made fully manifest in weakness, on the hope that God's Spirit can bring vitality and life out of that which we have pronounced dead.
What a tragedy when graduates forget their hopes and dreams for a better world. Temper those hopes and dreams, but do not forget them. Ditto for people of faith. We would do well to remember and cling to the dreams and visions that are of God.
Click here to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
Sermons and thoughts on faith on Scripture from my time at Old Presbyterian Meeting House and Falls Church Presbyterian Church, plus sermons and postings from "Pastor James," my blog while pastor at Boulevard Presbyterian in Columbus, OH.
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Sunday, May 17, 2009
Musings on the Daily Lectionary
This Sunday I won't be in my regular place in worship. Instead I'll be watching my daughter graduate from Boston University. (She and her classmates would greatly appreciate it if you distinguished between her school and Boston College.) And although I won't be preaching, it is interesting to hear the gospel reading for today's worship, John 15:9-17, in the context of a graduation.
Something similar is happening with the disciples when Jesus speaks to them shortly before his arrest. He tells them to abide in him, to love one another, and to bear much fruit. The disciples are graduating from their time of training with Jesus, but modern day grads would do well to abide in Jesus, to love one another, and to bear fruit.
I think that the very lowest level of education is to learn to do something. And some people graduate from college having learned only this, even if it is how to do something difficult and complicated. I'm much more impressed by education through which people have gained a sense of meaning and purpose. And when I read an article about how human technology has outpaced human ethics, I wonder what level of education has brought us there.
"As the Father has loved me, so I have loved you; abide in my love... This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you... You did not choose me but I chose you. And I appointed you to go and bear fruit, fruit that will last." Jesus has taught his disciples much, but most of all, he wants them to stay connected and grounded in his love and his purpose for their lives. Not bad advice for grads, or for all the rest of us.
Click here to see today's readings.
Something similar is happening with the disciples when Jesus speaks to them shortly before his arrest. He tells them to abide in him, to love one another, and to bear much fruit. The disciples are graduating from their time of training with Jesus, but modern day grads would do well to abide in Jesus, to love one another, and to bear fruit.
I think that the very lowest level of education is to learn to do something. And some people graduate from college having learned only this, even if it is how to do something difficult and complicated. I'm much more impressed by education through which people have gained a sense of meaning and purpose. And when I read an article about how human technology has outpaced human ethics, I wonder what level of education has brought us there.
"As the Father has loved me, so I have loved you; abide in my love... This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you... You did not choose me but I chose you. And I appointed you to go and bear fruit, fruit that will last." Jesus has taught his disciples much, but most of all, he wants them to stay connected and grounded in his love and his purpose for their lives. Not bad advice for grads, or for all the rest of us.
Click here to see today's readings.
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Musings on the Daily Lectionary
I'll be heading out later in the day on the long drive to Boston. This weekend I'll watch my older daughter graduate from Boston University, and so it is perhaps not surprising that I wonder about her faith life as she goes "out into the world." In my limited experience, many young people have lots of faith questions and few faith certainties. They would seem to be precisely the sort of folks who would come to congregations to explore their questions.
Yet from what I gather, folks with more questions than answers, be they young or old, often find that the Church is not a very inviting place. It can seem to outsiders a place filled with certainties, where all questions have already been asked and answered, and where there is not much room for exploration.
In his letter to the Roman Church, Paul writes, "Welcome those who are weak in faith, but not for the purpose of quarreling over opinions." Repeatedly in his letters, Paul insists that the Church must always have the needs of those weak in faith, new to the faith, struggling with the faith as a primary concern. To Paul, anything that hinders a person from coming to faith or growing in faith is a travesty, and a failure to be the Church of Jesus Christ.
I know that I often have a strong desire to do things correctly, to get them right, and I suspect that this puts up a barrier to those whose faith questions are more basic or fundamental than my concerns over the finer points of getting things right. May God help me to become a person of welcome to all who are seekers and questioners.
Click here to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
Yet from what I gather, folks with more questions than answers, be they young or old, often find that the Church is not a very inviting place. It can seem to outsiders a place filled with certainties, where all questions have already been asked and answered, and where there is not much room for exploration.
In his letter to the Roman Church, Paul writes, "Welcome those who are weak in faith, but not for the purpose of quarreling over opinions." Repeatedly in his letters, Paul insists that the Church must always have the needs of those weak in faith, new to the faith, struggling with the faith as a primary concern. To Paul, anything that hinders a person from coming to faith or growing in faith is a travesty, and a failure to be the Church of Jesus Christ.
I know that I often have a strong desire to do things correctly, to get them right, and I suspect that this puts up a barrier to those whose faith questions are more basic or fundamental than my concerns over the finer points of getting things right. May God help me to become a person of welcome to all who are seekers and questioners.
Click here to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Musings on the Daily Lectionary
The standard Presbyterian worship service has a "prayer of confession" right after the opening song of praise. (So do many other denominations.) The notion is that when we encounter God, we cannot help but fall on our faces, realizing how woefully undeserving we are to be in God's presence. And yet, a common complaint that pastors get about worship concerns a dislike for this prayer. "It's such a downer," one says. "I'm not that bad," says another. "Who wants to hear about sin," goes yet another complaint.
It has always struck me as a bit odd how we Christians will speak about being "saved," and then act like we don't need saving in the first place. We will proclaim that Jesus died for us, but then chafe at the notion that we are sinful.
In today's reading from Jeremiah, God speaks a word of hope through the prophet to the people of Israel who are about to be defeated and taken into exile. "I will make an everlasting covenant with them, never to draw back from doing good to them; and I will put the fear of me in their hearts, so that they may not turn from me. I will rejoice in doing good to them, and I will plant them in this land in faithfulness, with all my heart and all my soul."
If we are looking for joy in worship, there is a lot here. God's deepest desire is to bless and do good for God's people. But doing so requires those people, us, to be changed. Our hearts have to be reoriented. That's just another way of saying something has to be done about our sinfulness.
As the tax collector says in Jesus' parable (Luke 18:9-14), "God, be merciful to me, a sinner!" And Martin Luther advises that when we find ourselves before God's judgment seat, we should plead our faults and not our merits. I wonder why that is so hard for many of us?
Click here to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
It has always struck me as a bit odd how we Christians will speak about being "saved," and then act like we don't need saving in the first place. We will proclaim that Jesus died for us, but then chafe at the notion that we are sinful.
In today's reading from Jeremiah, God speaks a word of hope through the prophet to the people of Israel who are about to be defeated and taken into exile. "I will make an everlasting covenant with them, never to draw back from doing good to them; and I will put the fear of me in their hearts, so that they may not turn from me. I will rejoice in doing good to them, and I will plant them in this land in faithfulness, with all my heart and all my soul."
If we are looking for joy in worship, there is a lot here. God's deepest desire is to bless and do good for God's people. But doing so requires those people, us, to be changed. Our hearts have to be reoriented. That's just another way of saying something has to be done about our sinfulness.
As the tax collector says in Jesus' parable (Luke 18:9-14), "God, be merciful to me, a sinner!" And Martin Luther advises that when we find ourselves before God's judgment seat, we should plead our faults and not our merits. I wonder why that is so hard for many of us?
Click here to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Musings on the Daily Lectionary
My theological tradition produced, among others, the Dutch Reformed Church, the French Huguenots, the Presbyterians, and those barrels of fun the Puritans. Perhaps it's a stereotype, but many of us get our image of dour religion from folks such as the Puritans. And many people imagine most Christians as having a low fun quotient. They think of religious folks as worried about making sure everyone is behaving. They imagine us to be very judgmental, and, quite naturally, tend to imagine God in the same way.
One quote that I've heard used countless times in movies and on TV picks up on this image. A puritanical preacher hurls fire and brimstone judgments down on someone he views as a moral failure. And wagging an accusing finger at them says, "Vengeance is mine sayeth the Lord!"
Curious that this phrase is sometimes used to justify hatred or even violence against others, especially when you read it in its context. Paul is concluding his letter to the church at Rome with some general admonitions about Christian living, and the line about God's vengeance is there to dissuade them from using violence or taking vengeance. "Do not repay anyone evil for evil, but take thought for what is noble in the sight of all. If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all. Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave room for the wrath of God; for it is written, 'Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.' "
Paul clearly believes that God does judge, but he is insistent that we should leave that to God. In fact he urges us to care for our enemies as our way of getting back at them. Not much like the dour preacher with the wagging finger. And Paul also counsels rejoicing, love, hope, blessing others, living in harmony, being patient.
What sort of image do you have of religion? Perhaps more importantly, what sort of image do you project for others to see. Lord, help me to let others see your love.
Click here to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
One quote that I've heard used countless times in movies and on TV picks up on this image. A puritanical preacher hurls fire and brimstone judgments down on someone he views as a moral failure. And wagging an accusing finger at them says, "Vengeance is mine sayeth the Lord!"
Curious that this phrase is sometimes used to justify hatred or even violence against others, especially when you read it in its context. Paul is concluding his letter to the church at Rome with some general admonitions about Christian living, and the line about God's vengeance is there to dissuade them from using violence or taking vengeance. "Do not repay anyone evil for evil, but take thought for what is noble in the sight of all. If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all. Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave room for the wrath of God; for it is written, 'Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.' "
Paul clearly believes that God does judge, but he is insistent that we should leave that to God. In fact he urges us to care for our enemies as our way of getting back at them. Not much like the dour preacher with the wagging finger. And Paul also counsels rejoicing, love, hope, blessing others, living in harmony, being patient.
What sort of image do you have of religion? Perhaps more importantly, what sort of image do you project for others to see. Lord, help me to let others see your love.
Click here to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
Monday, May 11, 2009
Musings on the Daily Lectionary
My theological tradition, like many that came out of the Protestant Reformation, holds the Bible in very high regard. Its authority is above all others, and the Church's practices and beliefs are to be critiqued and reformed through the witness of Scripture. Not surprisingly, most of the big debates in my Presbyterian denomination are about what the Bible says, or more precisely, what it means.
Now some folks claim simply to take the Bible literally. But, contrary to the bumper sticker, that is virtually impossible to do. And so most everyone who takes the Bible seriously has some means for distilling meaning out of it. Some say that some parts trump other parts, as in New Testament trumping Old. Some simply choose to ignore parts that trouble them, or are at odds with what they hold dear. John Calvin, when he was wrestling with the Bible's ban on charging interest on loans, spoke of discerning an intent in the Law. He argued that the ban on interest was to keep the poor from being entrapped by the wealthy in the manner of the old "company store" that sold goods on credit and then trapped employees in a debt. But if loans with interest were instead used to help build factories that employed the poor, i.e. if a good was done via this interest, then the biblical ban need not be enforced.
Being theological descendants of Calvin, my denomination has wrestled with Scripture over the years, seeking to discern its intent. On occasions, we've had to revise what we thought we'd discerned. At various times in history we said that the Bible supported the institution of slavery and prohibited women from being pastors. Now we say the opposite, and both these cases serve as a reminder that discerning God's will is not always as easy or simply as we'd like.
Today's reading from Colossians is one of those that I am tempted to ignore. "Wives, be subject to your husbands... Slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything." Most Christians that I know are appalled at modern manifestations of slavery. Many campaign to end it. So how do we deal with a Bible passage that seems to approve of slavery?
I believe that mature Christian faith must embrace two things which are often in tension. We must recognize that we cannot adequately know God and God's will for us on our own. We need God's self revelation. We need the Bible to point us to the God we cannot know by our own devices. But at the same time, we cannot mistake the Bible for God. It is a witness to God. It points us to God as no other witness can do. Yet it is a large and complex witness filtered through the cultural assumptions and expectations of those who wrote and compiled it. And we must always acknowledge the difficulty and effort involved in discerning what God says to us through this witness.
May God's Spirit guide all of us as we seek to know God better, and know God's will better, through the Bible.
Click here to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
Now some folks claim simply to take the Bible literally. But, contrary to the bumper sticker, that is virtually impossible to do. And so most everyone who takes the Bible seriously has some means for distilling meaning out of it. Some say that some parts trump other parts, as in New Testament trumping Old. Some simply choose to ignore parts that trouble them, or are at odds with what they hold dear. John Calvin, when he was wrestling with the Bible's ban on charging interest on loans, spoke of discerning an intent in the Law. He argued that the ban on interest was to keep the poor from being entrapped by the wealthy in the manner of the old "company store" that sold goods on credit and then trapped employees in a debt. But if loans with interest were instead used to help build factories that employed the poor, i.e. if a good was done via this interest, then the biblical ban need not be enforced.
Being theological descendants of Calvin, my denomination has wrestled with Scripture over the years, seeking to discern its intent. On occasions, we've had to revise what we thought we'd discerned. At various times in history we said that the Bible supported the institution of slavery and prohibited women from being pastors. Now we say the opposite, and both these cases serve as a reminder that discerning God's will is not always as easy or simply as we'd like.
Today's reading from Colossians is one of those that I am tempted to ignore. "Wives, be subject to your husbands... Slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything." Most Christians that I know are appalled at modern manifestations of slavery. Many campaign to end it. So how do we deal with a Bible passage that seems to approve of slavery?
I believe that mature Christian faith must embrace two things which are often in tension. We must recognize that we cannot adequately know God and God's will for us on our own. We need God's self revelation. We need the Bible to point us to the God we cannot know by our own devices. But at the same time, we cannot mistake the Bible for God. It is a witness to God. It points us to God as no other witness can do. Yet it is a large and complex witness filtered through the cultural assumptions and expectations of those who wrote and compiled it. And we must always acknowledge the difficulty and effort involved in discerning what God says to us through this witness.
May God's Spirit guide all of us as we seek to know God better, and know God's will better, through the Bible.
Click here to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Sunday Sermon: "Who's In and Who's Out?"
In the Law given to Israel at Mt. Sinai, eunuchs are banned from being a part of "the assembly of Yahweh." Yet God's amazing and surprising love reaches out to a eunuch in today's reading from Acts 8:26-40. God's love in Jesus regularly shatters the boundaries that we think are sacrosanct .
Sermon, 5-10.mp3Friday, May 8, 2009
Musings on the Daily Lectionary
One of today's psalms, Psalm 148, is one of those Let everything praise the LORD psalms. Angels, sun, moon, stars, waters, sea monsters, hail, snow, mountains, trees, wild animals, birds, kings, princes, men, women, young, and old are all called to praise Yahweh. It is an extravagant explosion of praise, and the psalmist clearly thinks that such an extravagant explosion is natural, an obvious reaction in gratitude for all that God has done.
It struck me the other day -- I don't know if this is an original thought or if I'm simply remembering something someone else said -- that most of the things we feel proud about should instead be cause for gratitude, for thanksgiving. Proud to be an American? What did I do to become an American other than be born? Proud of my accomplishments? Aren't they largely the results of gifts I received, both those that are innate to me such as intellect and abilities, along with opportunities for education provided by parents and situation?
I don't for one second mean to denigrate the hard work of people. Who we are is always a combination of the gifts we received and what we do with them. But is seems there is a natural human tendency to take credit for our efforts without acknowledging the gifts.
John Calvin, my tradition's most significant forebear, said that the primary motivation for the Christian life is gratitude. Not fear, not desire to get something, but gratitude. I think Calvin would have thought that what we do with the gifts and opportunities handed to us is our way of saying thanks, our way of praising God.
May all that I do in some way give you praise, O God.
Click here to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
It struck me the other day -- I don't know if this is an original thought or if I'm simply remembering something someone else said -- that most of the things we feel proud about should instead be cause for gratitude, for thanksgiving. Proud to be an American? What did I do to become an American other than be born? Proud of my accomplishments? Aren't they largely the results of gifts I received, both those that are innate to me such as intellect and abilities, along with opportunities for education provided by parents and situation?
I don't for one second mean to denigrate the hard work of people. Who we are is always a combination of the gifts we received and what we do with them. But is seems there is a natural human tendency to take credit for our efforts without acknowledging the gifts.
John Calvin, my tradition's most significant forebear, said that the primary motivation for the Christian life is gratitude. Not fear, not desire to get something, but gratitude. I think Calvin would have thought that what we do with the gifts and opportunities handed to us is our way of saying thanks, our way of praising God.
May all that I do in some way give you praise, O God.
Click here to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Musings on the Daily Lectionary
Two very different newspaper columns caught my attention this morning. In the first, Miami Herald columnist Leonard Pitts, Jr. wrote about how people of faith were more likely to support torturing terror suspects than those with no religious affiliation. And he noted how non-Christians are often the ones who take hard or dangerous stands rooted in moral principle while many Christians choose to remain silent. Think German Christians during the Holocaust, or white, Southern Christians during the Civil Rights era.
Now sometimes those of us in the more liberal parts of the Christian fold want to claim that Pitts' criticisms fall harder on more conservative Christians. (White, evangelical Christians were the group with the highest level of support for torture.) But if we liberals fare better by some measures, on others we do not. We often want to trumpet how inclusive we are, how open to others of differing viewpoints, and what lovers of diversity we are. But I was reminded of how hypocritical we can be about this by -- of all things -- Rob Oller's sports column in today's Columbus Dispatch. He wrote, "It is an irony of our age: Those who preach tolerance show intolerance toward those they deem to be not tolerant enough." I have often observed a similar behavior amongst us liberal pastors. When we speak of being inclusive, that inclusiveness often extends in only one direction, to those more liberal than ourselves.
In today's reading from Luke 6, Jesus says, "Why do you see the speck in your neighbor's eye, but do not notice the log in your own eye? Or how can you say to your neighbor, 'Friend, let me take out the speck in your eye,' when you yourself do not see the log in your own eye? You hypocrite... Why do you call me 'Lord, Lord,' and do not do what I tell you?"
Why is it that many of us find it so easy to take Jesus' name, to call ourselves Christians, but also find it so easy to ignore what Jesus says to us? Lord, help me see myself as I truly am. And help me to become what you would have me be.
Click here to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
Now sometimes those of us in the more liberal parts of the Christian fold want to claim that Pitts' criticisms fall harder on more conservative Christians. (White, evangelical Christians were the group with the highest level of support for torture.) But if we liberals fare better by some measures, on others we do not. We often want to trumpet how inclusive we are, how open to others of differing viewpoints, and what lovers of diversity we are. But I was reminded of how hypocritical we can be about this by -- of all things -- Rob Oller's sports column in today's Columbus Dispatch. He wrote, "It is an irony of our age: Those who preach tolerance show intolerance toward those they deem to be not tolerant enough." I have often observed a similar behavior amongst us liberal pastors. When we speak of being inclusive, that inclusiveness often extends in only one direction, to those more liberal than ourselves.
In today's reading from Luke 6, Jesus says, "Why do you see the speck in your neighbor's eye, but do not notice the log in your own eye? Or how can you say to your neighbor, 'Friend, let me take out the speck in your eye,' when you yourself do not see the log in your own eye? You hypocrite... Why do you call me 'Lord, Lord,' and do not do what I tell you?"
Why is it that many of us find it so easy to take Jesus' name, to call ourselves Christians, but also find it so easy to ignore what Jesus says to us? Lord, help me see myself as I truly am. And help me to become what you would have me be.
Click here to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
Musings on the Daily Lectionary
I've written before about the cavalier, overly casual way many of us approach God, as if God were our co-equal or our buddy. But while I think we would do well to recover a sense of awe about God, I would not want us to imagine God as simply distant, powerful, and terrifying. Both Old and New Testaments of the Bible insist that the awesome God who created heaven and earth is deeply concerned for all creation, as verses from one of today's psalms attest. "God heals the brokenhearted, and binds up their wounds... God covers the heavens with clouds, prepares rain for the earth, makes grass grow on the hills. God gives to the animals their food, and to the young ravens when they cry." (Psalm 147)
Over and over the Bible is quite clear that God cares deeply for us. And while the life of Jesus' shows that God's love does not mean that life will always be a piece of cake, a basic, fundamental claim of the faith is that God loves us and wants good for us. What could be more wonderful? As the Apostle Paul says in his letter to the Romans, "If God is for us, who is against us?"
Amidst all the uncertainties and vagaries of life, what a wonderful thing to fall back on. God is for us. God loves us. Thanks be to God!
Click here to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Musings on the Daily Lectionary
Luke's version of the Beatitudes has never been as popular as the one found in Matthew. Not only are the poor simply the poor, not the "poor in spirit," but there is a corresponding list of woes. Here is a portion of today's gospel. "Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you will be filled. Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh... But woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation. Woe to you who are full now, for you will be hungry. Woe to you who are laughing now, for you will mourn and weep."
Does God really care more for the poor? Does God really place a curse (that's what a biblical woe is) on the rich and those who are laughing? If so, then I sure seem to work pretty hard to get myself under a curse.
The Bible is a complex document, and it is filled with metaphor and hyperbole. But these verses are still startling. And it seems to me that the more literally one reads the Bible, the more problematic these words become. I am no biblical literalist, but nonetheless, the verses surely say something about God's priorities. So why do my priorities seem so different?
Click here to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
Does God really care more for the poor? Does God really place a curse (that's what a biblical woe is) on the rich and those who are laughing? If so, then I sure seem to work pretty hard to get myself under a curse.
The Bible is a complex document, and it is filled with metaphor and hyperbole. But these verses are still startling. And it seems to me that the more literally one reads the Bible, the more problematic these words become. I am no biblical literalist, but nonetheless, the verses surely say something about God's priorities. So why do my priorities seem so different?
Click here to learn more about the Daily Lectionary.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)